2006-10-19 01:44:24 · 15 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
it is a natural "urge" that libs have and it (pelosi) could not resist
2006-10-19 01:46:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
NAMBLA does not have parades, stupid.
Pelosi supports the gay and lesbian community.
She does not support NAMBLA or pedophiles in any way, shape or form.
Just because NAMBLA marches in some pride parades does not mean everyone in attendance supports them.
There is no legal way to keep NAMBLA from marching in any parades, but trust me, the gay community overall does NOT support them.
By your thought-system, the entire republican party supports pedophiles. They withheld information about Foley. They supported his actions by sweeping them under the rug.
Now THAT's what I call supporting pedophiles!
2006-10-19 02:10:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They don't get it do they?
elaeblue: The problem is that by Nancy Pelosi marching in a Gay Pride Parade, closely following behind a vocal NAMBLA supporter, she is de facto supporting NAMBLA.
She is also a vehement supporter of the ACLU, they also defend NAMBLA.
A politician of her caliber should realize you are judged not just on your own merits, but also upon the company you keep. She keeps company with supporters of pedophilia.
2006-10-19 02:00:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What a freakin' lie.
Number one, there has never been such a thing as a NAMBLA parade.
Number two, this is nothing more than a desperate Republican distraction from the Foley case.
Number three, Harry Hay, whom everyone is saying was a NAMBLA member, was never a member of NAMBLA. They simply quote - out of context, I might add - a statement he once made in the 1960's as support for their awful agenda.
Thus, Number Four, that makes you, Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, and any number of people spreading this vicious story nothing but a pack of worthless liars.
Do research for yourself instead of repeating the talking points memo that you all read to spread filthy lies and you might actually appear to be literate, you rube.
2006-10-19 01:57:22 · answer #4 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, Charlie, but as much as I find Pelosi to be a loathsome slime mold of a politician, she did not march in a NAMBLA parade. It was a homosexual pride (or some parade.
However, NAMBLA members did march in the parade. I'm not impressed with all the protests about homosexual not being pedophilia, yet they allow them to march in their parade. Sorry, even tolerance of their presence means tolerance of their ideas.
2006-10-19 02:07:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Usual liberal fair. Anything a liberal does is OK and if you question it you are intolerant. Anything a conservative does is another matter. The double standard is staggering. You don't have to limit it to Pelosi though. There are several liberal scandals at this time, most notably the Harry Reid ethics violation, but you won't hear liberals address it. Instead if you mention it they try to change the subject with Foley or one of the other Republican scandals. The problem with this is that Conservatives are condemning Foley and other Republicans involved in scandals. I have heard no liberal voices doing the same for people on their side of the aisle. This type of behavior always leaves me wondering how strange it must be to be liberal.
2006-10-19 01:52:11 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, i does no longer. NAMBLA has spent very a lot of attempt attempting to piggyback itself on gay rights moves--to the utter disgust of truly some the GLBT community. I comprehend Rick Santorum has popularized the idea that if homosexuals are ok, then so is sex with children and animals. This, for sure, ignores the question of man or woman consent to relatives. the perfect element i visit claim for Rick Santorum, or for you in case you undertake a similar body of recommendations, is that I somewhat have each and every desire you're insincere. all of us who obviously argued that consent has no longer something to do with it would want to no longer be depended on round children, pets, or cattle.
2016-12-05 00:04:35 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasnt NAMBLA's parade it was a Gay Pride Parade and many politicians have been in them. I am soo sick of this stupid debate about gays and wish everyone would realize that gay isnt the same thing as pediophila.
2006-10-19 01:48:28 · answer #8 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You mean Pelosi marched in a CONSERVATVE NAMBLA parade? Wow!
2006-10-19 01:50:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
And I'll bet that she "touched" some little kids while marching.
That's what Democrats do.
(I like it when Pelosi's eyes pop out. A sure sign that she is a pervert.)
2006-10-19 01:48:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Did you vote for Mark Foley?
2006-10-19 03:12:09 · answer #11 · answered by tangerine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋