There is certainly a lot of evidence that this woman is a liar and a cheat. Her ex-husband Alfie Karmal refers to her as a 'compulsive liar' and serial adulterer who had many affairs during their marriage. This is backed up by numerous family members and ex-friends. Also, the British journalist Heather Mills (no relation) has a dossier of evidence that 'Lady' MacCartney used to pretend to be her in order to obtain freelance journalistic work. This latest 'revelation' was clearly designed to turn public opinion against Sir Paul but has had the opposite effect.
Never mind, Heather - no matter how badly you come out of this, I'm sure that there's a career for you on tacky, low-rent shows like 'I'm a Nonentity, Get Me on the Television'. Pro-celebrity hokey-cokey, anyone?
2006-10-21 23:42:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
From day one she's always appeared as a gold digging, celebrity status seeker - now it looks like 1st impression was right - too bad it's taken him this long to dump her.
Poor Paul - he must feel like he's a 'Fool on the Hill' - should have got a pre-nup with his amount of money - too trusting for his own good. Also she should not have access to the whole pie - it should be limited to the amount of money earned during their time together - even then I'd be reluctant to give her anything - she's lead the life of Riley while with Paul and has certainly enjoyed all the trappings his money could buy.
2006-10-19 08:27:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Miranda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
She always has been. Have you read about her past? It's cheating,lying and theft all the way. She was only ever with McCartney for the money,but he was too stupid to see.
2006-10-19 08:15:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Taylor29 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a bit suspect coming out with all this now - I think she's lost a lot of credibility.
Looks like Stella was right all along!
2006-10-19 08:14:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥ Kazbaz ♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am with Stella. I would be suspect of someone, anyone who had chosen the profession of model, such as it was. She parlayed her injury into this mess. Paul will never lose any of my respect.
2006-10-19 08:16:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by finaldx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I think so because why would she stay all this time with him if he did what she says he did. She had plenty of money to leave.
2006-10-19 08:21:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by elaeblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paul is not a woman beater!
2006-10-19 08:15:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by bookfreak2day 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She a conniving little ***** she knows what she was doing from the beginning
2006-10-19 14:23:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by linz172 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it is such a shame.
2006-10-19 08:20:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by catzrme 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know she is. Proof
2006-10-19 08:13:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by bor_rabnud 6
·
0⤊
0⤋