I've just read in my newspaper Heather Mills McCartney's cross petiton and it sounds like an average day in my house.
2006-10-19 01:04:51 · 10 answers · asked by Harriet 5 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Heather Mills McCartney never mentioned what she did to get Paul so angry, did she? She's playing the innocent little angel, when we all know she's an arrogant, money-grabbing maneater. Don't believe the lies. It's all to get public sympathy and get more money out of Paul.
2006-10-19 01:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the general public finds it hard to believe that Paul McCartney would do those things. Except maybe the illegal drugs bit. Everyone knows he likes a spliff.
None of us know what goes on behind closed doors at the end of the day but personally I find it hard to believe myself but that may be because I always thought she was only there for the money and not the love if you know what I mean. It's amazing how old rich people seem to attract young good looking people isn't it. It has to be their sparkling personalitites that does it. Nothing to do with the unlimited wealth that she is now trying to get her mitts on.
The fact that her submission to court was "leaked" says a lot to me to be honest. Things get "leaked" when someone can gain something from the "leak". Nothing gets leaked by accident to the media these days.
I wonder what the legal stand-point is in regards to compromising any court proceedings?
2006-10-19 08:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by Martin G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You must not know about Heathers past. She used to be a prostitute in London but of the posh kind. She used to date wealthy Arabs who paid her well. She fought her way to Sir Paul and lied about her porno past. The fact of the matter is Heather did not earn any of the money she is claiming. The money was made by The Beatles and Paul's solo career. Only a couple of years doesn't give her the right to claim half his fortune. She is a money grabber of the worst kind. I wouldn't believe her despite any evidence.
2006-10-19 08:19:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
not forgeting that heather is a born liar though chick but if those items are taken as grounds for divorce maybe you should be doin some serious thinkin yourself n leave the two of them to it.you shouldnt be puttin up with wrong behaviour yourself and from my point of view you are far more concerning to me than the heather mills in this world.take care
2006-10-19 08:12:08 · answer #4 · answered by nendlin 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heh now! Come on! I am not her greatest fan either and we all bought into the world's greatest love affair of Paul and Linda....
But at the end of the day it is their break up and their sadness and we don't know enough to take sides.
Let's leave them alone and give the entire sad story some dignity.
2006-10-19 08:18:41 · answer #5 · answered by Christine H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sir paul was blinded by her,he was on a re-bound,o.k.he's not perfect,but she is one slippery customer,she no's exactly what shes been doing,paul was out of his depth with this one,just remember it was her who faxed this doc to the press,to get the undecided like you on her side.
2006-10-19 16:20:28 · answer #6 · answered by Cool Dude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why we bother talking or even thinking about either of them. They've probably got more money than all of us put together on here !!!!!
2006-10-19 08:26:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she is making it all up just to make herself look good because no-one likes her!!
2006-10-19 08:14:43 · answer #8 · answered by Angelkiss85 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
never liked macca but she is en evil spiteful money grabbing *****
- there i feel better now
2006-10-19 08:43:00 · answer #9 · answered by silly billy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
gold digger she signed a pre nup anyway
2006-10-19 08:07:29 · answer #10 · answered by toon_tigger 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋