hi....before i ask this i really would just like to point out that i dont wish to offend anyone or am i?

Question

looking for a government to be slated....

last night i watched a few docs on 9/11. I have never seen anything like this before, as ive only seen what our media had shown.....who agress that 9/11 looks like something other than planes crashing into the wtc that day and what do you believe?
once again i really dont want people to answer to offend people as i know this is a sore subject for many!

yeh of course planes crashed into the towers...what i mean is how the "clapsed and why did wtc 7 fall.....no building before has due to fire....wtc 7 was not even hit!

Answer 1

I saw those planes crash into the Towers on live TV, and even have it recorded. I have watched it in slow motion many time. My VCR allows for that, and even in clips. Nothing hit those Towers but planes, and these other documentaries you have watched appear to be trying to make suggestions in people's minds to make them doubt reality, and cause controvery to perhaps give the terrorists who are responsible for the act a few points in the media, and in the world. Often after a big event has happened, people make up stories a long the way to make it more interesting, they embelish the facts, and change them to cause a hightened reaction. Do I need to chop down history for you? Sorry, I don't have the time, lol, but every story about anything is always changed around after the fact, that's a fact for you.

To Cruz, are you stupid? Mr. Bush was NOT in Texas, he was reading to school children when the news of what happened came to him! Get your facts straight.

Answer 2

If you had any knowledge of physics, this would all make perfect sense..... In fact in the 1990s there was a bombing in the parking garage of the WTC, and it caused a lot of damage, but it was reported on the media, that the only way to destroy the buildings would be to attack them from the top.

The impact of the planes, generated heat that caused failure of the metal structure of the building. The point of impact was also a critical point of integrity and acted kind of like a lever, sending vibrations through the entire building. Once enough heat had melted the I-Beams (remember this was jet fuel exploding upon impact....lots of heat) the top of the building fell directly down, and then caused column buckling sending the entire building to the ground. this vibration, and force of the two towers that were hit, affected other buildings causing them to fall.

This is not some conspiracy theory. Two planes ( and nothing more) hit the towers, and the buildings that fell did so as a result of the planes crashing. The media, documentaries, and having watched it the day it happened, are not going to change the facts of what happened. Dont try to turn this into something it is not. How could you have not ever seen what happened???? Where on earth were you?

Answer 3

Nobody questions that planes hit the WTC, the mix up is with the Pentigon. There is a theory that it was a missle & not a plane involved. Appearently there was nothing of a plane or the victims found, and the opening in the bldg is to small to have been a plane.
The Pres was in Fla., not TX, no matter, but that was the thing they keeps bugging me the most. The 1st plane hit before he arrived at the school and he joked with the kids that he had been a pilot, but this guy wasnn't a good one. A little while later the SS told him of the second strike. He reacted as if he was told they were having Chinese food for lunch. At this point I would expect the Commander-in-Chief to politely tell the kids he was sorry but something very important is going on and he has to leave, Not Georgie, he sits there reading his book upside down. If he knew absolutly nothing, than it would be safe to assume there were going to be a lot more attacks. His lack of concern is beyond belief.
While all this was going on, Daddy Bush was in New York in a meeting with Osama's brother, the one who financed Georgie W's failed oil exploits in Texas some years before.

Answer 4

I have looked at all the “evidence” I can find that supports the idea that it was an inside job. I have also looked at the rebuttals published to debunk that evidence. And, as I told a lady earlier, I watched an airplane hit the second tower on live TV. I have been around airplanes all my life. One of the duties of the last job I had was aircraft accident investigation for the US Military. I was never pressured to publish anything but what I considered to be the truth. No men in black, no red haired captains, no threats, no nothing, just find the truth and publish it. I am confident when I say, trust me, it was an airplane, a real no kidding airplane. Additionally, I have absolutely no reason to believe the first tower was not struck by an airplane as well. As far as I am concerned the case, at least that portion of it is closed.

Did you know that conspiricy believers have been doing this all my life? When I was walking to the cafeteria at my high school I got the word that President Kennedy had been shot. About 6 - 8 months later some rag; we didn't have the internet, published a "VERY VERY FUZZY" picture taken through a telescope. Even under magnification I couldn't make out anything but some black and white dots, but the contention was that it was the President in a wheel chair on one of Aristotle Onassis' islands.

My point is that if a person wants a conspiracy they can make one. The problem is two people can keep a secret if and only if one of them is dead. Evidence, real hard evidence will surface, especially if thousands of people are involved in the conspiracy.

The people who will buy these fabrications at face value will not even look at the rebuttal, they will not accept the testimony of people who served with John Kerry in Viet Nam but still insist that a document, admittedly fabricated, is proof that the sitting President is AWOL.

Honestly, I am not carrying anyone's water at this point. I am an equal opportunity voter. I hate everybody and all parties. I don't trust anyone anywhere near Washington DC or anyone that might ever be there but I see absolutely no EVIDENCE to support anything but aircraft damage causing the collapse of the Twin Towers. And, as I said earlier, I have looked.

Answer 5

First of all to say no other buildings have collapsed due to fire is nonsense. Many buildings have collapsed even solid stone buildings weakened by fire have collapsed. There have been other tall buildings similar to wtc that have collapsed in exactly the same way, floor by floor, usually during construction.
The intense heat from the fire weakened the steel girders (steel girders don't grow on trees they're made in furnaces where heat is used to turn the metal liquid so you can pour it into the shape you require) and the weight of the floors above caused a catostrophic failure.
As each floor collapsed the 'explosions' heard below was the air being compressed and forced out.
Think of how long it takes a demolition company to prepare a building, setting explosives, taking out parts of the building to weaken it, the size of the wtc (2 of them!) would have taken months of preparation apparently with no-one noticing.
The other thing all these cospiracies overlook is the sheer number of people that would have to be involved at all levels, yet not one of them has felt guilt or remorse at what happened and come forward!
It's human nature to want to believe there must be a conspiracy for things (marilyn, jfk, the moon landing, princess diana)
How many suicide bombers do you have to hear about to realise these people would fly a plane into a building to cause death and destruction, they do not care about human life, the truth is sometimes exactly what you see, deal with it.

Answer 6

I truly believe that the whole thing was either known about in advance through intelligence sources, or (worst of all) orchestrated to enable the US Government to become embroiled in the so called "war on terror".

I've seen an awful lot of programmes detailing the various hypotheses about what actually happened - about how and why the towers pancaked downwards rather than toppled and about how no evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon was ever found (pictorally), but what clinches it for me that the whole thing is a massive conspiracy is the reaction of George Bush when told of the disasters. A: the person telling him in his ear didn't have time to communicate the full horror of what had just happened - so I think he only had time to say something like "Sir, the first planes hit their target" - watch the footage.
B: Having just been told the awful news, why did he sit there with a blank expression for five minutes then start reading a story to the school kids? A normal leader would have made some excuse to the children and left to lead his country.

Answer 7

I live in the U.K. and have seen a lot of the docs you saw. There are many of them out there, and depending on the doc makers opinion, they can be made to convey anything. I am of the opinion, as increasing numbers of people are world wide, that the U.S. Goverment was involved in what happened. There are just too many unanswered questions surrounding it all. Why were the fighter planes that were scrambled, when these planes were heading towards New York and were known to have been hijacked, coming from so far away? Why didn't they intercept the airliners? Why was extra insurance taken out on the buildings one week before it happened? What are those puffs of smoke you can see happening on the lower floors as the buildings begin to collapse? Why have so many people who were there said they heard explosions all over the buildings just before they collapsed? Why did other buildings on the site, untouched by the planes, also collapse neatly into themselves? Those are just a few of the many un-answered questions. Why did the only plane allowed to leave America that day contain a Bin Laden? Don't tell me the American goverment wouldn't do it to its own people. Check out the recently declassified Northwoods papers. Yeah, I know I'm another conspiricy believer, but then there are many millions of us, some with more interesting unanswered questions than I can come up with. I think our friends, the American people, should wake up and ask themselves if there really could be any truth in what these so called 'conspiricy nutters' are saying. And while you are at it, also check out how many times both Bush Presidents have used the phrase 'New World Order'. If you research what that phrase actually means to them, you should be very worried. God bless the American people. If all of this offends you, then you are walking around with your eyes closed. The truth, as we conspiratists tend to say, is out there...

Answer 8

Yes Muslim terrorist's flew two airplanes into the World trade center killing thousands of innocent people from all over the world and several building were destroyed.
That is the Fact.

Every thing else is propaganda, hear say and conjecture.

When you view the tapes of GW when he was told what happened did he look like a person who had prior knowledge?, or did he look dumbfounded. So IF it was a conspiracy and the commander in chief appears not to have fore knowledge WHO in the US government should be slated?
Was there a major problem in the US intelligence agency. YES
Was the program you watched trying to make a profit from alleging a conspiracy, YES
Did you really buy it hook line and sinker?

Answer 9

I undstand what your saying, its still a very raw subject. I personally believe that I saw the second plane, not the first, but the second I did see clearly. It is very hard to believe that the American government / media etc, has banned a lot of information that we perhaps in Europe see. I remember when the American soldiers were arrested over the torture of Iraqi's, my cousin in Boston had absolutely no idea about any of this as your media was not showing the news that the rest of the world saw.

Answer 10

I wish so too! I have always wanted this! There were many times when I couldn't decide between two really really good answers. And I don't think it's fair to put them to vote coz I want to choose both answers. I also wish that one can choose "no best answer" without putting the question to vote because sometimes none of the answers actually answer the question. Other times, there would be one or two answers that do answer the question with a "yes" or and "no" and really don't deserve the ten points.