You are not allowed to discredit 911 alternative theories if you haven't spent more than 20 hours researching?

Question

Am i wrong in assuming that the vast majority of people who firmly denounce the "conspiracy" theorists, really haven't read anything about it other than mainstream news or the popular mechanics article. They haven't spent any real time reading what scholars for truth have to say..am i wrong?

Clearly most of you haven't looked at it.. farakas dont answer my questions you've proved yourself inept! foo

Answer 1

Twenty hours at the very least and with an open mind. I myself have put in at least two hours a day for the past two months for a total of 120 hours. Some of that time has been used to help spread what I have found out. I figure it is the least I can do for our country, its given us so much: Time to give a little back.

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite

A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made $4 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

Answer 2

Well, there is a problem here. The only researchers who work full time ferreting out conspiracies are people who come to the research table with preconceived notions. An educated person is not going to buy into a conspiracy with 9/11 because we know who did it and we know how they did it and to what foreign governments they were attached. If one hypothecized that all foreign governments with the exception of Great Britain, Japan and South Korea got together and pulled it off, well, that's not so far removed. But to suggest that the Bush administration was in cahoots with any of the bad nations, that the administration was/is so evil as to take a stand alongside the Hitlers, Stalins, etc. is not conceivable to an educated mind that does not have a political vendetta against Bush and Co. It just isn't. So, let's move on until "Deep Throat," if there is to be one, contacts the Washington Post and blows the whole thing open. Remember the Kennedy Assasination? Many of the conspiracy theories had a basis in possibility, yet no one on their deathbed has taken a minute to clear their conscience. Until someone provides the combination to the safe that holds the evidence of a Kennedy conspiracy as they lay dying, we will go with the skinny guy with a hatred of America because he just didn't stand out and he didn't like that. Oswald did it.
If Americans can't "get" the coming death of untold numbers of Americans because of a porous Southern border by terrorists already in our country, do you really think any of us are going to spend 20 hours researching something that insults an educated, no agenda, mind?

Answer 3

I spent a lot of time reading and watching articles on 9/11. The information definitely brings up some very interesting questions. They can't be answered by the official story. The 9/11 truth guys might be wrong about the conclusions they come to, that remains to be seen, but the questions are good.

The planes and the subsequent fires can not explain all the events of that day. Maybe some, and I admit I don't personally think so, but not all.

There are far too many coincidences that happened on or before 9/11 for them to be coincidences and when you add to that the unusual behavior of the President and his security, you get a scary picture.

How could a commercial plane, flown by hijackers hit the pentagon? That has to be one of the most secure, best protected buildings in all the world. Am I supposed to believe that the great and powerfull military of the United States was beaten by 19 people? I'm sorry, but that is hard for me to believe.

Keep on trying, but know most of these people don't want to hear the truth. Thinking is just too much trouble.

Answer 4

Too many of those in disagreement believe that 20 hours of watching Fox News counts as serious research. If they do happen to research other areas, then they try to compare it to what they've heard on Fox News.

Actually the statement should be this: If your education doesn't match the education of those that are with Scolars of 9/11 Truth, then you shouldn't be allowed to discredit alternative theories. And if you don't have a good grasp of physics, then be silent until you do.

Also, if people don't know what Operation Northwoods was, then they should go back to the cave from whence they came, thinking about how sweet it was of Mr. Bush to continue reading about goats while the WTC towers were in flames.

Answer 5

Ocean freshening. The international temperature conduit is ocean currents. Not the solar, no longer the wind, no longer magnetism. England is hotter than Alberta on the identical range for the reason that of ocean currents. The hot water is pumped up there from the south through the Gulf Stream. Since the planet has existed, it has a propensity to be hot. From it is publicity to the solar, to the presence of liquid water and the movement of it is center, warmth is generated. The confluence is that the planet is droop in a lack of warmth. As the planet warms, because it on the whole does, the polar caps soften. The melting introduces recent water into the sea. The alterations in density and salinity will gradual and even give up the warmth pump. Once that occurs, right here come the glaciers. The planet cools, the recent water is frozen once more expelling the salt and the pump starts once more. Predictions at the timming are problematic for the reason that it takes years for the planetary climate to reply to each and every thermal occasion and the controls for information evaluation ought to incorporate the presence of enterprise now. There aren't any safe units for that. There are a few with various agendas which can be complicated the talk through suggesting that there's some thing radical and instantaneous guy can do to crush the fires of nature. There isn't. Any attempt might be puny through comparrison. That isn't to mention it isn't valued at doing for the reason that there are lots of different advantages to incorporate recent air and cleanser water. To count on that with out enterprise the temperature might stay steady is solely intellectually cheating. Forgive the practical narrative. I did not consider any one right here might be fascinated about the main points of hydro physics and planetary comparitive information. Edit: OK reasonable adequate. There are dozens of theories related to local weather difference charges. Mine might simply upload to the combo. Some are absurd for my part and a couple of maintain water(pardon the pun). The factor is that hydraulics are not able to be denied. One fee is based on an extra, there may be not anything that shows the planet would no longer cool at an expanded fee both. The influence is the identical, because the planet warms it is going to continuously cool. It simply does not topic. As a species we're more proficient at handling any difference than we ever were earlier than. We'll be excellent. You would make the argument that there are extra people now then ever earlier than. Thanks to the Haber Bosch approach there are billions extra people now that the planet demands to help and we would lose a few therefore of wasting land lots or water however not one of the units are predicting that, Al Gore no longer withstanding. Since we now have been right here, there are a few locations of the planet that experience certainly not been so sizzling nor so bloodless that they would no longer help our lifestyles kind. Will the planet be extraordinary than what we've grown conversant in over the final few thousand years? Of direction it is going to. The handiest consistent, is difference. Are we inflicting the fee of difference for the reason that of our exercise? Possible however most likely no longer definitive. Can we opposite it through diminishing our numbers and or our exercise? Presumptious, to mention the least. In any occasion, it might handiest marginally put off what's obviously inevitable. Every piece of Paleoclimatic information in live performance with geophysical, geochemical and sedimentological information says that is precise. The mere proven fact that Paleo climates are continually noted within the plural says that is precise. Relax.

Answer 6

Unfortunately, most people have not spent 20 minutes of research on this matter. Even looking at only main stream media reports, the official story is just too incredible to believe. Just compare pictures of the Pentagon and Shanksville, Pa. to every picture you can find of any other plane crash in the history of aviation and you'll see one thing missing from from 9/11 pictures. A plane!!! Also one can seem to explain why WTC 7 fell. I have read the 9 /11 commission report and it doesn't answer any questions about would happen that day. It merely tells a story and that's about. There was no investigation.

Answer 7

20 hours? Is there like a class or certification now on this ridiculous topic? I am an intelligent person who can discount every ignorant theory and lie that has been brought forth in regards to the conspiracy theories. Anyone that gives this 20 hours and still buys the conspiracy theory needs a lot of help, a great deal more education, and any amount of logic would be step in the right direction.

Answer 8

Yes, you're wrong. I've easily spent twenty hours watching the Loose Change videos, and browsing through the conspiracy websites. I've spent just as much time browsing through sites that debunk all the conspiracy theories.
I don't believe one word of the 9/11 conspiracy theory.

And just because I disagree with you does NOT mean I'm "inept." Get over yourself. I would be willing to bet that you're not smarter than me. Your question demonstrates ignorance and a lack of intelligence.

Answer 9

Where did we get these rules...Everyone seems to want it to be more...Why is it not okay if some crazy people flew planes into buildings...i am open to it...Just need more proof than the freefall of buildings....this administration can not keep emails from brownie private after Katrina hit New Orleans...How are they supposed to keep this kind of thing quiet

Answer 10

That's a pretty arbitrary standard. How many hours of research do you require of the anti-moon-shot theorists' claims before I discredit their claims?