English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-18 22:51:24 · 3 answers · asked by David . 2 in Politics & Government Politics

farakas stop answering my questions you are completely misinformed. Larry Silverstein is not a firefighter, I have no idea what u are talking about, he is the owner of the twin towers. He said we decided to "pull it" there were no people left in the tower at that time, pull it was the demolition refrence to blow up the tower.

2006-10-18 23:48:17 · update #1

PULL IT ISSSSSSSSSSSSSSS a demolition term, its a lie lie lie that its not. I and others have called demolition companies and asked them.. also hell its said in a documentary in refrence to PULLING building 6 for demoliton.. the fires were small and regardless. FIREEEEE DOESNT DESTROY skyskrapers.......learn man learn!!!

2006-10-18 23:55:34 · update #2

3 answers

he was talking to the cameraman, he is a homo

2006-10-18 22:53:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, let's see:
He was a fireman, so I imagine he was using the term the same as many other firemen would use it: "Get everyone out of there!"
Why would a fireman give the order for the demolition of a building?
Yes, "pull it" IS used in demolition. But why would a fireman use it?
WTC 7 was not just damaged by fire. It was also hit hard by falling debris from the North and South Towers. Several other buildings in the area were completely destroyed as a result.

2006-10-18 22:53:51 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 1

He was directing the fire dept. to pull their men and equip out of the building. Pull it is not a term used in demolition, and I really don't believe he hooked fire trucks to the building to PULL it down do you?

2006-10-18 23:48:59 · answer #3 · answered by mark g 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers