Natural justice principles are derived from natural law wherein liberal views are not allowed to intervene with normal things in life just like marriage of persons with the same sex because reproduction cannot be consummated.
2006-10-18 22:12:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As the question suggests the principles of natural laws, this could be a catch 22 just as the who came first the chicken or the egg, are thoughts are permeated and construde by inherent cognition of the present moment weighed by the scale of need and neccesscity that of equating saddness or happiness, which again is a factor of stress that we relay as circumstance In the Hindu philosopy KARMA is the basis of all give and take which in the west is derived by newton the laws of accelaration, now take the effects and education of the phiysics of newton, marry it with Einstien, invite archemedis, who ever discovered the laws of light reflections and refraction let all this dance in a party called kaliedoscope and you will have visualise the natural justice principles are 9/8ths of the natural world that is every neutron, amtom, molecule of individual to the collective cohesion of laws that constitutes the universe and the exactness of the universal soul the metaphysics of the body called matter by which we as human become one eighth share holder of the earth inintially there after in prorata proportion to the universal soul, yet we have institued laws to govern since if there was only one person on earth there would be no requirement of justice or principles so collective involvement from the associating multiple of two and onwards family, ethnic, creed, community, society we reflect the necessities of principles it is the human desire at the same moment fear that glues our intents to respect laws be it in or out justice is only the axis as catalyst in mantaining calm for the moment, real justice can only be relevant if the laws that are purpoted to be for the sancity of governance than we will need to dig deep into the self.
Samarendra d
2006-10-19 06:02:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by SAMARENDRA D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Natural justice includes the notion of procedural fairness and may incorporate the following guidelines:
A person accused of a crime, or at risk of some form of loss, should be given adequate notice about the proceedings (including any charges).
A person making a decision should declare any personal interest they may have in the proceedings.
A person who makes a decision should be unbiased and act in good faith. He therefore can not be one of the parties in the case, or have an interest in the outcome. This is expressed in the latin maxim, nemo judex in sua causa: "no man is permitted to be judge in his own cause".
Proceedings should be conducted so they are fair to all the parties - expressed in the latin maxim audi alteram partem: "let the other side be heard".
Each party to a proceeding is entitled to ask questions and contradict the evidence of the opposing party.
A decision-maker should take into account relevant considerations and extenuating circumstances, and ignore irrelevant considerations.
Justice should be seen to be done. If the community is satisfied that justice has been done, they will continue to place their faith in the courts.
2006-10-19 04:54:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by SteveT 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
com on law and Justis as it should be but its a shame com on Justis is a thing of the past no more free speech no more rights as a Englishman under English common law these are over ruled by new E U Laws and laws protecting the alien to our country we have less and less common laws we need it back B N P will help give it back read manifesto Dave
2006-10-19 05:05:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Psycho Dave 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Eye 4 an eye tooth for a tooth!
2006-10-19 05:06:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Andy C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
An eye for an eye kinda thing
2006-10-19 05:03:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
common law of the land. the laws that are in practice today.
2006-10-19 04:54:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by fair-and-squire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
base in constitutional draft,the bill of rights, due process of law,uphold civil liberties,freedom of expression
2006-10-19 05:31:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by mario t. reoyan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋