Making a difference in the representation of an idea is not making a difference in the idea itself.?

Question

Making a difference in the representation of an idea is not making a difference in the idea itself.

The difference in the realization of an idea is not the difference in the idea itself!

Answer 1

its not diff in idea madam.u need to be definetly innovative else where can u stand up in the crowd?

Answer 2

Would Intelligent Design qualify as an example here?

Although the idea is being represented differently, the idea itself remains unchanged from Creationism?

A different representation does not change the idea that is being represented but it can give a different impression and different representations of the same idea may be more or less palatable to different people.

Answer 3

I feel if we make difference representation of an idea, sometimes this will lead to another idea.

For example, consider the statement "youth grows mustache" can be changed as "youth gives mustache". And both are two different representations but give totally different meaning.

Answer 4

Cognitive bias

A cognitive bias is any of a wide range of observer effects identified in cognitive science and social psychology including very basic statistical, social attribution, and memory errors that are common to all human beings. Biases drastically skew the reliability of anecdotal and legal evidence. Social biases, usually called attributional biases, affect our everyday social interactions. And biases related to probability and decision making significantly affect the scientific method which is deliberately designed to minimize such bias from any one observer.

Overview
Bias arises from various life, loyalty and local risk and attention concerns that are difficult to separate or codify. They were first identified by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman as a foundation of behavioral economics. Tversky and Kahneman claim that they are at least partially the result of problem-solving using heuristics, including the availability heuristic and the representativeness heuristic.

Recently, some scientists (David Funder and Joachim Krueger) have raised doubt as to whether all of the 'biases' are in fact errors. Their theories hold that some so called 'biases' may in fact be 'approximation shortcuts', that aid humans in making predictions when information is in short supply. For example, the false consensus effect may be viewed as a reasonable estimation based on a single known data point, your own opinion, instead of a false belief that other people agree with you.

The following is a list of the more commonly studied cognitive biases

For other noted biases, see list of cognitive biases.
Hindsight bias sometimes called the "I-knew-it-all-along" effect, is the inclination to see past events as being predictable
Fundamental attribution error the tendency for people to over-emphasize personality-based explanations for behaviors observed in others while under-emphasizing the role and power of situational influences on the same behavior.
Confirmation bias the tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions.
Self-serving bias the tendency to claim more responsibility for successes than failures. It may also manifest itself as a tendency for people to evaluate ambiguous information in a way beneficial to their interests.

Answer 5

Depends upon how we debate on the idea.In favour of or against.

Answer 6

You make my brain ache but I love you for it!

Answer 7

it is...