She's claiming he stabbed her in the arm with a broken wine glass and attempted to choke her.
She just wants some of his squillion fortune. Greedy *****.
2006-10-18 20:52:14 · 42 answers · asked by Mum-Ra 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Definitely don't believe it. Does anyone? After all the years he was married to Linda without any complaints, is he going to suddenly change that dramatically? Mind you, she's enough to drive anyone to it. He shouldn't give her a penny, just put enough in trust for the child.
2006-10-18 21:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by Allie c 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If they prove that he probably didn't do these things, then they should compensate him by giving him her leg, and banning her from having another one. Instead, she could have a big spring, and be like a human zebedee.
I think that violence against anyone, especially women in the marital home, is unacceptable. But I've also seen first hand what false claims can do. And when they are proven false, it puts the case of true women back - makes each one more suspect. If these things did happen, I'd have respected her more if she didn't go to the papers right away, but instead waited until the divorce proceedings were over before going public - it looks to me like she is going for public sympathy, but she is in danger of it blowing up in her face.
2006-10-18 21:05:56 · answer #2 · answered by Mudkips 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i in my opinion imagine that Heather turbines is mendacity. She replaced into well-known to lie plenty before she met Paul. also, i imagine she replaced right into a stripper or a hooker (with a million leg) lol. in any case, i don't think of i might want to believe the interest of an ex prostitute anyday. no longer in difficulty-free words that, yet i have been a huge fan of the Beatles for a lengthy time period, and that i have studied each and every of their lives. Linda and Paul were so satisfied mutually. I bear in mind interpreting a lengthy time period in the past (can't bear in mind the position it replaced into at) yet I examine it, and Linda suggested that she couldn't be any happier in her life. She had Paul, her children, and however else she had. So aparrantly their relationship replaced into large. i imagine that Heather is in basic terms mendacity about it desirous about interest.
2016-12-04 23:58:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I do not think that there is a shred of truth in theses alligations and how strange they were leaked??????
She is going for the sympathy vote of the public and she will never get it from me.
She should take a leaf out of Linda's book and shut up, look after her family, keep her pride and dignaty, have a sence of duty and responsibility if Linda could she would deck that woman for what she has done to Paul.
In my opinion she saw, liked what she saw and went out of her way to get him. She is no better than the kiss and tell people after it is over watch her publically humiliate Paul and Stella.
2006-10-18 22:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by momof3 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think she needs to stop focusing on how to squeeze him for what he's worth and think about how all of this is affecting little Beatrice.
9 times out of 10 in divorce cases it is always the child that gets hurt.
I don't believe that he abused her because she seems like the kind of person who would not put up with something like that. She is a gold digger and a liar and I hope Paul comes out on top after all this is over.
2006-10-18 21:13:10 · answer #5 · answered by Stefy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heather is just greedy, poor Paul..he was married to Linda for years and years and Linda never never ever said Paul was a beater or a druggie and they always looked happy, Im sure Linda would have left him ..so what does that make Heather?..a gold digger
2006-10-18 21:05:36 · answer #6 · answered by fran 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm sitting on the fence with this one.
These are big accusations to make & Heather says she can prove them.
Considering she has a really good lawyer, I can't see her being foolish enough to make things up. That said, the spin is what wins. It may be they were both drunk, he knelt on a wine glass, picked it up and fell over near her, or something like that.
I know it's a cliche, but it's the child I feel really sorry for.
2006-10-18 21:12:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't buy it for one second. Paul McCartney is a gentle man. That's like saying Mr. Rogers beat his wife. She knew when she married him that she would wind up divorcing him. She went along for the ride just to see what it's like to live life as a star. Now she's bored with him and wants a younger man. She's a money grubbing lowlife.
2006-10-18 21:03:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No she's an utter...think shes just looking for the lolly £££££££££££££s
It's the guy who introduced them needs choking and stabbed with a wine glass...lol
Although I think it may be "Wicked Willie" whos the real culprit...again!
2006-10-18 21:01:33 · answer #9 · answered by smithy 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We don't really know these people but reading her accusations that he forced her to stop breastfeeding' - her evidence is that months prior to her giving birth, he stated that he didn't want her to breastfeed as they were 'his breasts' and he 'didn't want a mouthfull of breast milk' - well that is the standard joke of most men whose wives are about to havea baby - she sounds like an hystical, self-centred *****. I hope she chokes on her wooden leg. She's really cooked her goose with the British public now, good riddance to her.
2006-10-19 00:56:15 · answer #10 · answered by Nikita 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋