this is a fantasy football question
2006-10-18 20:41:02 · 5 answers · asked by Tommy P 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I agree with the previous post. A mediocre RB is just as beneficial as a good WR. And Foster is a decent RB, so it's a no-brainer.
2006-10-18 20:54:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...
Foster splits some carries with D. Williams and now that Steve Smith is back him and Key are gonna see alot of balls coming their way, that will take away from the running game. Plus Foster isnt a back who is gonna get you alot of TD's.
Deion is already starting to become Hasselbacks "go to" receiver. He is the best receiver Hasselback has had and especially since Alexander is out Deion will be the beneficiary of alot of balls and prob. alot of TD's (2 on Sunday).
2006-10-19 05:52:50 · answer #2 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no no no no no. deion is going to be huge. unles u have t.o chad johnson and marvin harrison then i wouldnt get rid of branch. not for foster atleast. and whoever says a mediocore rb has the same value as a branch type of reciever needs to go back to the basics of fantasy football. trust me i have normally 16 or more teams every year and hardly ever finish below 3rd unless i have injuries to key players. ie shaun alexander mcnabb last year if l.t. went down i would definatley be screwed.
2006-10-19 05:04:46 · answer #3 · answered by bigpoppa_2x@verizon.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, a good running back is always more valuable than a wide receiver. Plus I think D. Williams is still hurt, so he won't take carries away from foster. I say do the trade.
2006-10-19 03:50:22 · answer #4 · answered by remys 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
foster is iffy, he will eventually split carries again
try to get another for branch if possible, if not take it if u need the RB
2006-10-19 04:28:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋