If so, where can I find proof?
2006-10-18 20:36:31 · 13 answers · asked by Brianman3 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For the record, the left wing propoganda machine known as "Farenheit 9/11" is NOT what I consider proof. I want real proof, people! Documentation. Show me copies of the documents. Give me links. Prove they're valid documents.
2006-10-18 20:37:56 · update #1
Those valid documents have been very conveniently destroyed by someone.
What is a fact is that there are huge gaps in his military records, and that he failed to report for a scheduled doctor appointment, and that at one point he was diagnosed with hemorroids which is very uncommon for a healthy young man unless...
2006-10-18 20:49:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Facts:
paperwork clearly shows he did not show when he was supposed too. That is Absent With Out Leave or AWOL
Whether he was reported for being AWOL just means there was no intention to prosecute or punish him (could this be because of daddys power?)
As far as the pay question- Military people are paid by the month. The only way to prevent/remove that pay is through punishment.
There has never been a question on whether or not he failed to show, actually it has been admitted. The only a demand has been for paperwork, which would not exist unless he was punished!
Further, his unit went to Vietnam during the time when he was failing to show- this technically would make him a deserter, whether he received punishment for it or not!
2006-10-18 23:23:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is basic to believe what you want to believe without question. I somewhat do not comprehend if the Bush guy replaced into ever AWOL. yet i might want to need a lot extra data than what's geared up on the aforementioned website. it isn't a authorities website. And the picture of the Dan particularly incident, is subject to very a lot of suspicion, when you consider that for sure the bloke that set up the information superhighway website had an agenda to push. incorrect information is really basic to fabricate on each and every area of the political isle. So do i believe it? perhaps.... perhaps no longer. i do not take something because the gospel actuality that comes variety someone with a political agenda to push on those no longer in the authentic comprehend.
2016-12-04 23:58:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you get a copy of that document, check out any dates that have a suffix (14th, i.e.). You will probably notice that they are abbreviated. This did not happen until the advent of Microsoft Word. It would have originally been typed on a typewriter, which wasn't capable of typed abbreviated suffixes for numbers. Just so you know what to look out for...
2006-10-18 20:48:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is no conclusive proof either way. The National Guard record keeping was dismal, or the records disappeared for some reason. We just don't know.
2006-10-18 20:46:16 · answer #5 · answered by notme 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
no they have showed the records that showed he got payed for his time and you don't get payed if you go AWOL
2006-10-18 21:18:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No real proof that he did. But of course there are those who swear it's true. I guess they think it makes them lok better? lol
2006-10-18 20:50:58 · answer #7 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Here is the AWOL document you asked for.
http://thumbsnap.com/v/hFXd1BNL.gif
This is in regards to his drunk driving arrest.
http://thumbsnap.com/v/cNm3MTR8.gif
What the public hears about is just the blow back of a much larger circus of ignorance in the Republican party.
2006-10-18 20:52:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
No. The letter which purported to show that was demonstrated to be a fraud.
2006-10-18 21:16:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes he went AWOL. He also was using cocaine and got arrested for drunk driving. His daddy bailed him out just like he did with his oil companies.
2006-10-18 20:42:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋