300 million people is not a positive accomplishment. Why is the idea of more people and less wildlife so appealing?
2006-10-18 19:20:41 · 7 answers · asked by natalie 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Because we're so in love with ourselves and our larva.
2006-10-18 19:21:53 · answer #1 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Get real. There is no population problem. Did you know that if you took the population of the ENTIRE WORLD and put them in four member family units and gave each family unit a quarter acre to live on, you could fit them into an area no bigger than Texas? Yup, its true.
http://judgeright.blogspot.com
2006-10-19 02:33:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why are people like you so ignorant??? I simply dont remember the last Macy's Day Parade for thanksgiving and Christmas being an extravagent party for overpopulation. I LOVE WILDLIFE, BUT I LOVE PEOPLE MORE!!!
2006-10-19 02:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If it's me or an animal, I'm choosing me. 300 million in the USA is not exactly overpopulation anyway. The real crisis will soon be an under-population of sorts, thanks to the government's fraudulent ponzi scheme known as social security.
2006-10-19 02:30:58 · answer #4 · answered by Zombie 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
it's miss leading
the US birth rate is low, it's aging and immigration that grows this country.
With out immigration the population would be dropping or flat.
almost all 1st world countries only grow through immigration, they all have low birth rates.
The work needs to be done in 3rd world countries as far as population is concerned.
2006-10-19 02:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by hogie0101 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because a tree can't hug you the way a woman does.
2006-10-19 02:26:16 · answer #6 · answered by asylum31 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I dont know, but on my birthcertificate I am american number 293,760,341!!!! I am 23
2006-10-19 02:29:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋