English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why must you libs raise my taxes to give to the lazy in the form of welfare? It is sad that we tax payers have to baby the lazy of this country

2006-10-18 15:32:48 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

protect our country vs feed the lazy What the hell That is a no brainer Protection!

2006-10-18 15:35:27 · update #1

Hmmmm libs are unable to answer questions LMAO

2006-10-18 15:36:28 · update #2

hey linus the racist no sources just your usual lies

2006-10-18 15:45:43 · update #3

22 answers

they think defense is the potential wall dividing mexico...LMAO

2006-10-18 15:36:09 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 6 2

I really wish people wouldn't give foolish comments about the Iraq war motives as reasons for anything. We started the Iraq War due to Kuwait asking us to help defend them against Iraq's attack. We did so. We then waited a decade for the UN to do something about WMDs that EVERYONE thought they had. The UN was played for a fool and documented that the WMD materials that Saddam was PROVED to have had disappeared, and Saddam was STILL bragging to his allies that he had them, even then. After 911, we had a choice: Fight a two front war or end one (we were STILL at war with Iraq, there WEREN'T two wars, there was ONE). We decided to end Iraq because we were already on the ground and ready. THEN we went after Afghanistan. The whole WMD thing is like saying "We eat to chew." Dear gods, you can't get any more simplistic. Educate yourselves, folks. BUT: DO look into the costs of military expenditures. It's amazing how much we spend. Is it necessary? I don't know. The question is a GOOD one. We need to do something to end the spending, PERIOD. Ending earmarks would be a good beginning. At least it would end each side arguing "They refused to help the children/the military, the etc." when in truth they were voting down the fifty OTHER earmarks in the same bill. Each group has their own priorities. As a Democrat, I act as brakes on the Republicans. I just don't hate half the country in the process (that's just insane). We need that balance. I'd hate to see what happens if we ever reduce our military to nothing. Yet, I'd not give up being the watchdog on Republican spending on things I don't think are that important. I do agree with them on one thing. No more SOCIALISM. I've had it with that group. They need to go back to their OWN party.

2016-05-22 01:07:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whether libs want to spend money on defense doesn't matter because the Republicans have control and spend a great portion of your tax dollar on defense and have eliminated domestic programs to do so. Remember, there is a huge war profiteering machine now under Bush made up of contracting firms friends that are disrupting the Pentagon and the military machine and siphoning off dollars and health care spending from the troops. If that's what you wanted, then your wish has been granted many folds over.

A Niagara falls of your money is spilling into the pockets of Bush's friends and they're very happy.

2006-10-18 15:37:42 · answer #3 · answered by Reba K 6 · 3 2

Just proves my point that Republicans believe in every man for himself and the Liberal believe we are all in this together. Sad that you would not help a fellow American back up after they fall down. How selfish. Taxes are an investment in your country one of the greatest countries in the world. Only a few abuse welfare but you keep going with your Republican talking points if it makes you happy.

2006-10-18 15:40:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If you do some research you will see that the United States is already spending an incredibly disproportionate amount of money on national defense in comparison to education, etc.

As for welfare. I guess we should just sit back and watch poor people die, eh? It can replace Nascar as the sport of uneducated inbred hicks like yourself.

2006-10-18 15:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by red line 3 · 3 1

You would rather habve bombs that kill people than a school where you could get an educaion.

But, ironically, it is the lack of decent education that creates idiots like you.. which leads to the need for more bombs.. and so on.

Zieg Heil, Semper Fi, whatever

2006-10-18 15:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Are you taking large amounts of controlled drugs??? THEY DO NOT hate to spend money to defend this country.. REMEMBER 1/2 of the guys is Iraq are good-ol' -Dem folks!! They just hate to see $500. hammers and $2000 tolit seats.. Unfinished schools in Iraq, and rattle trap hummers and equipment for our troops!!! As for most real Americans, we had rather feed our own folks!! REINSTATE SA-DAM and let him run his darn country!!!

2006-10-18 15:48:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think its because they love themselves so much that they think no one could dislike them if they were in power,certainly not enough to attack us therefor there's no need for a strong military

For John:people with low incomes are usually people too lazy to get an education.Mexican workers are no better than whites.

2006-10-18 15:39:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yea, forgive us for thinking that our money should go to help people instead of kill them... I guess we're just crazy that way...

Look, just because you have a low income, doesn't mean your lazy. This capitalist propaganda has been put out for the last two centuries. Look at the mexican immigrants, they word harder than any white americans on this site will ever work, and how much do they get paid?

Let our poor die? You'd like that wouldn't you? You're suggesting we spend money to kill people with guns and bombs, and pull money away from other people who need it to live, so you're suggesting we kill to birds with one stone...

2006-10-18 15:35:39 · answer #9 · answered by John S 4 · 2 3

Because they think its intollerant to those poor islamic terrorists. Those liberal bastards will do anything to hurt America. They want to give the poor all our hard earned money. There was something else that preached that. Cant think of it off the top of my head. It started with communi....eh, can't remember. Oh well.

2006-10-18 15:36:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

If you were to THINK FOR YOURSELF instead of believing stereotypes, you would find out that 1% of our Gross National Debt goes to Public Welfare, whereas 7 - 10% goes to CORPORATE WELFARE. That means 7 - 10% goes to business that MAY OR MAY NOT NEED IT. Check it out instead of coming on here making stereotypes without proof...

2006-10-18 15:41:39 · answer #11 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers