world trade center building 7?

Question

why the hell is that not being investigated properly the man that owned the buildings admitted that he gave the order to pull the building this is a demolition term that a side the building was demolished on the same day that the main to buildings came down look at the footage of that building and tell me the hell they didnt do it with exsplosives and if it was (which theres no way it couldnt have watch it for your self on google video)it would take over a week to prime that place with exsplosives which they couldnt do becasue it was suposedly to dangerous to go in and it was demolished on september the 11th what the fuk is going on how come this has not been covered by the media properly seriously look at the video its like 1minute of your time or if you want the big picture watch terrorstorm on google video,this for me is crazy that no one is questioning this in main stream media,if you havent seen it or not going to dont bother answering.

thats stupid saying all buildings are pre primed with exsplosives 1 the exsplosives wuld become unstable over 50 odd years and 2 you would have heard about it in that amount of time christ people really stick there head in the sand dont they.

seriously joe you havent read what ive said at all actually read what i wrote theres no getting away from it.

rubish rukidding just look at the bloody footage christ y havent you alreadyseen it.

i said that aside he indicated that they droped the building fact.

sad people read what you are writing,whats this gotta do with my grammer the points are there and you dont wanna even look at them or you just make exscuses.

sorry rich i dont go on those sites im just pointing out whatthe man that owned the buildings indicated and what i see with my own eyes.

im taking medication but your telling me the buidings were pre primed with exsposives just in case the building was ever compramised not even that popular mechanis bull shi t says anything about that christ what is going on here.

Answer 1

Well what a can of worms you opened. It appears as usual that the people who have no answers on this subject revert to "personal abuse". That's their one and only tactic. Larry Silverstein, who owns the World Trade Centre, admitted in an interview on television in Sept.2002 that the NYFD and himself decided to "pull" the building. Photographs of the building prior to "demolition" show minor fires on 2 floors. Silversteins investment in building 7 was approx. $368 million. The payout from Industrial Park Insurers was $861 million {nice little profit] Although high rise building have caught fire all over the World, there has NEVER been a similar building collapse because of fire. Here we have 3 buildings collapse from fire on the same day? The 9/11 Commission "completely" ignored building 7, and I can only imagine why. Money talks when it comes to these type of people. End of rant, have a good day.

Answer 2

The conspiracy theory here is simply not credible. I think if there was anything to find, the media would be all over it.

Check the links below, especially the second one...

I happen to know a few things about explosives. One of the things I happen to know is that electrically primed charges are susceptible to static electricity, radio transmissions and even potentially natural phenomenon. In a blasting zone people are not allowed to use two way radios. When working with explosives electrically primed or not, one must continually touch ground to eliminate static. If all these buildings are wired, why haven't accidental detonations ever been recorded?

Controlled demolition is just that ...'controlled'. If a building like this was wired, the damage and the fire could break lines, burn explosives sever det cord or otherwise play havoc with the engineered demolition plan. How does your theory compensate for that?

Answer 3

In short, the media is controlled...

Hitler knew the media is the one of the most important facets of any successful campaign.

Society at large is kinda soft minded and prefers to be told what to think...

PS... That load of bush-it about it being pre-wired is only true because they wanted to pull it... on 9-11... just in case the towers didnt fall on it.

The building was shutdown and wired days, not months or years, before....

Yeah... we smell a rat...

Even if only 1% of the "theories" are facts...
there's a huge cover-up leading to a greater percentage...

Thanks for asking, Patriot!

Answer 4

I am sure your medication will get refilled tomorrow,

don't confuse building 7 with the rest of the towers, these are two differnet situations, the main two towers were hit directly by the planes, and that one in a million possiblilty happend and they fell because of that.

Building 7 as many may or may not know was mostly government and included even a bunker besides storage of who knows what, Most likely because of what was stored there, the building was wired for destruction of security of the building was ever at risk. And because of the serious damage to the building, the choice was made to blow building 7 for government security reasons

I doubt we will ever know what was in building 7, the UFO people claim the aliens were in there, the new world order people say that was their head quarters.
I would say more of those government secrets no one will ever know

Answer 5

7 did no longer crumple from warmth of alternative homes, or from unsafe components. It replaced into pulled down with the others for the insurance money. somebody in bin encumbered's team replaced right into a civil engineer or perhaps he did no longer anticipate any of the homes to interrupt down. i think it replaced right into a mix of undesirable layout, low fee components, and poisonous textile from the planes themselves. It had a metallic brace so how does warmth soften metallic?

Answer 6

Right on- Let's hear the big picture. Who pushed the envelope? Who thought outside the box and ran it up the flagpole (Ignore that one, it's so last year) Those exsplosives could explose- Everybody chicken- Sorry, duck.

Answer 7

I don't even see a question mark, much less a question? There IS one period and a couple of commas.
Is this supposed to be another conspiracy theory?
Before you think you have the expertise to evaluate why a building should be brought down in the middle of what equated to a war zone, please learn how to spell and don't even bother with alleged sentences that contain 500 words.
There are MANY reasons for why that building was raized - and your b.s. is just that.
Hope you like my "answer," even though you ordered me not to do so somewhere in your garbled missive.

Answer 8

Pull isn't just a demolition term. Pull can be used in many different contexts including evacuations.

If he said, "and then I told them to set off the explosive to bring the building down", then yeah, I would say you had something, but here you are grasping straws.

Answer 9

What if you were to find out that every sky scraper is pre charged for demolishion during construction?

You wouldn't enter the building would you.

I've seen the movie. I heard many people spout off spontaniously.

IF and only IF 7 went down in a controlled demolishion it was prewired at construction time.

The wacko's that believe the government was involved are just WACKO's plain and simple.

Answer 10

Common sense and logic tell you that a building that shape and size could not be completely demolished by falling debris striking one corner of it.Beside that you can actually see the detonations going off.Beats me why no credible explanation has been given or no media interest.Stinks of a cover-up.