2006-10-18 15:09:26 · 9 answers · asked by muchacho99 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
He's a bright man and if he has a position, you should follow it and not be so judgemental.
2006-10-18 15:11:09 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 0⤊ 7⤋
His plan has been to deceive Christians by using co-opting them, completely help abortion up till thought and if a newborn is by hazard born alive after a botched abortion to have it killed somewhat of letting existence stay. unhappy, yet actual. He basically signed into regulation by using ability of government Order, a provision to fund remote places abortions returned under the guise of "family contributors making plans" after a ban Bush positioned on. This signature will fee human beings one hundred sixty million each 12 months and fee the existence of thousands and thousands of unborn. If we cherish existence, it is going to be for all including the main harmless of humanity. Socialists are disgusting, what have they have been given against detrimental foreigners in any case?
2016-10-19 23:34:01 · answer #2 · answered by cardish 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is the murder of babies, just as men murder everybody else. Who gave you the right to kill babies? No one did. That baby is not your body part, it is a living human being with the right to live a full life. Men having been killing people for thousands of years, now women want to kill as a choice. If you do not want to get pregnant, keep you damn clothes on.
Understrand?
2006-10-21 15:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pass the Stem Cell Research Bill. (Jun 2004)
Protect a woman's right to choose. (May 2004)
Supports Roe v. Wade. (Jul 1998)
Voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
sounds pretty liberal to me.
2006-10-18 15:11:50 · answer #4 · answered by michelle 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
VERY liberal. One of his errors is calling for government funding and taxation for EMBRYONIC stem cell research, now that SEVERAL excellent alternatives are available (including proven adult stem cell research) instead of the unproven embryonic method. Obama ignores the fact that many people oppose the use of their tax money for cloning and the killing of human embryos.
Adult stem cells are harvested from umbilical cord blood, bone marrow, and now even from skin and fat.
2006-10-18 16:10:19 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's a common sense view.
2006-10-20 10:52:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abortion IS not apolitical issue!! IT IS A CHOICE that is between a woman and her Dr. and her God. EVERYONE else should BUTT OUT!! NO it it no a completely liberal view.. !/2 of abortions performed are on very CONSERVATIVE females... (Do as they SAY not as they DO!!) IT is all a matter of controlling females!! I hope he is pro-woman!! If not WE sure won't vote for him..... EVER
2006-10-18 15:21:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
He is pro-choice, but the laws are already in place for that, so it is really not the issue that people make of it.
2006-10-18 16:12:46 · answer #8 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he is a idiot far left wing nambla supporting idiot! he is no moderate at all!
2006-10-18 15:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋