English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have a friend who has gone through surgery, chemo and radiation and the cancer appears to be gone, but after undergoing genetic testing has decided she should consider a double mastectomy.

2006-10-18 14:59:14 · 6 answers · asked by Picsin3D 1 in Health Women's Health

6 answers

I had a friend that had the double and reconstruction at the same time.. that was about 25 years ago and she is a surivor still.. hope this helps... good luck to your friend.

2006-10-18 15:04:24 · answer #1 · answered by ncgirl 6 · 0 0

10 years in the past i replaced into clinically determined with lobular carcinoma in-situ. it truly is the precursor in case you'll to breast maximum cancers. My mom died of breast maximum cancers at the same time as i replaced into 14. I watched her wade through horribly for a year before she died. obviously i replaced into PETRIFIED to ensure that I had this difficulty. My selections were...a million) Do no longer something 2) Have a prophylactic mastectomy (bilateral) 3) Have a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and take tamoxifen. I chosen to have a bilateral mastectomy with reconstructive surgical operation. by technique of having a bilateral mastectomy, the opportunities of me getting malignant breast maximum cancers went right down to below 5% it is below the similar old woman on the line. i'm no longer sorry that I did the mastectomies, yet frankly i does no longer have the reconstruction. It looks as undesirable because it would want to with in basic terms the mastectomy scars. no longer something is ever as solid as God makes it...you comprehend what I advise? i presumed that i replaced into one smart woman and kicked the undesirable breast cancers butt....unhappy to say very last year i replaced into clinically determined with lung maximum cancers...type of ironic does no longer you say? solid success.

2016-12-04 23:47:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In any thing I've ever experienced it wasn't necessary to have both breasts removed if only one was cancered....that's truly a question she should discuss with her Dr.

2006-10-18 15:01:49 · answer #3 · answered by Barbara H 3 · 0 0

i know someone who did that. i would say talk to a doctor and see what he/she thinks about it. if there is a very high chance of getting cancer in both breasts, i would seriously consider it.

2006-10-18 15:02:48 · answer #4 · answered by <3 Kaitlyn* 2 · 0 0

for peace of mind, at a follow-up she could mention this option to her Dr.; if she feels strongly this is what she needs to do then she should do it

2006-10-18 15:15:08 · answer #5 · answered by phyllis_neel 5 · 0 0

Yes having no breasts is bad - death is worst - life is precious preserve it. be blessed

2006-10-18 15:05:31 · answer #6 · answered by zqx357 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers