Considering the FACT that North Korea had nuclear material during the 1st Bush Administration, how are the rednecks, right wingers, neocons and other assorted idiots blaming (lying on) Clinton for allowing North Korea to build nuclear weapons?
Basically, its obvious that the rep. party's first reaction to NK testing a bomb was to blame Bill Clinton (a REAL PRESIDENT), but where do they get all this ridiculousness about Bill Clinton FINANCING NK?
The Bush Administration recently proclaimed "THERE IS NO MILITARY OPTION AGAINST NK" and that they might offer NK 2 REACTORS if NK will stop attempting to build nukes and dismantle the work they've done so far.
To summarize, The Bush administration - OFFERED NK REACTORS.
Bill Clinton did exactly what he had to do (offering food and appeasement) to NK and the simple fact is, UNDER BILL CLINTON THERE WERE NO NUCLEAR TESTS and NO NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION.
2006-10-18
14:46:54
·
5 answers
·
asked by
?
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Could someone show me all rattainable evidence to PROVE BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that NORTH KOREA is somehow MAGICALLY CLINTON'S FAULT?
I know there really isn't any ...its just that I wanna see the redneck idiot liars quote all there conservative services, fox news, national vanguard and stormfront.
2006-10-18
14:48:23 ·
update #1
I see a bunch of stupid redneck statements but I see no evidence Clinton allowed NK to get nuclear weapons. I GUESS THEY LOSE THIS ROUND.
2006-10-18
15:05:44 ·
update #2