English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i, like everybody else, enjoy reading Star magazine, but when you go to certain websites to find out where Paris or Lindsay was an hour ago, it seems to be to much. why is it that we can't leave these people alone? i am not jealous, but i feel for them. Adam brody can't even curb his dog without getting stalked! how can we stop this addiction?

2006-10-18 11:22:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

9 answers

Everybody has the right to privacy. Being a celebrity is just their job. They should have to be able to go out to McDonald's or Barnes and Noble without having to get dresses up and without their hair & make up done.

2006-10-18 12:23:34 · answer #1 · answered by Merrick 4 · 1 0

Well some celebrities have their privacy,.. e.g alexis bledel but the thing is the ones that have this privacy and yet are in movies.. maybe not as often as other but have their own t.v series and etc.....well, you may not be able to place their names... because most celebs have people would know is bacause of the repoters,media and etc.. and they stick to those celebrities.......
Alexis bledel broke up with her boyfriend this summer and nobody but them or who ever they tell will know why and they were going out for 3 and 1/2 years and were living together.

2006-10-18 11:34:48 · answer #2 · answered by walking 3 · 0 0

I think you do to a certain extent. Everyone deserves the right to privacy and protection especially children. I think it's low when the press and paparazzi target and exploit the kids. However the stars that are constantly complaining about this issue need to lighten up and not forget where their success came from. Much of their success is due to all the fuss and muss on t.v. radio and the internet and don't forget the fans.

2006-10-18 12:19:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pretty much. Comes with the territory. If you don't like it move out of the country. Some celebs already had to. Madonna lives in England, Johnny Depp lives in France. They do what they have to do to get privacy. Personally I couldn't handle it.

2006-10-18 11:37:50 · answer #4 · answered by *Cara* 7 · 0 0

When someone becomes a celebrity, they give up the right to privacy when they're in public - meaning any events or whatever. BUT, if they're home or something like that, people should have the respect to stay off their case.

2006-10-18 11:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by zippythejessi 7 · 0 0

I think celebs should have privacy-i mean they r having lunch and u wanna stalk 'em? come on! just cuz they are in the public doesn't mean they don't wanna have some privacy. But as long as we buy taploids and watch ET(i admitt i do that) it'll neva stop.

2006-10-18 11:25:42 · answer #6 · answered by Annie 5 · 0 0

i think of they could settle for a tad bit greater privateness than they have. like the papzi's going into Britney's gated community... thats slightly plenty. Plus, regrettably, various that's that they comprehend the place the papzi's would be, and that they circulate to them. exposure, skill funds.

2016-12-26 22:45:35 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

unfortunately u do although many tr y to keep it to themselves.

2006-10-18 13:00:38 · answer #8 · answered by Nora G 7 · 0 0

they should have privacy.

2006-10-18 11:40:20 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers