2006-10-18 11:12:57 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
The two definitions are not mutually exclusive, nor concretely definable in a universal sense. Morality is relevant to culture, among other things. Ergo, one does not need to be uncouth when being immoral.
2006-10-18 11:27:05 · answer #1 · answered by ericscribener 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You'd have to tell me what you consider as immoral and what you consider as uncouth. When you get your stuff together, come back.
2006-10-18 18:18:44 · answer #2 · answered by wmf936 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, but it is immoral to be uncouth
2006-10-18 18:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by Earthbound Misfit™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IN MOST INSTANCES, YET IT IS UNCOUTH TO BE IMMORAL.
2006-10-18 18:37:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I guess it is. I just want to be honest, with myself and others. I thought if I came clean they would too. But apparently not.
2006-10-18 18:15:15 · answer #5 · answered by Smitten_Kitten 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there´s no direct relationship between the two.
2006-10-18 18:22:08 · answer #6 · answered by juamps 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't that a double negative?
2006-10-18 18:17:20 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ ms. @ ♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sod off already! nobody cares!
2006-10-18 18:36:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
amongst other things yes it is!
2006-10-18 18:15:07 · answer #9 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah but so what , I mean how cool is it to be couth??
2006-10-18 18:14:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋