English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i seem to believe that nucular explosions can disturb the great canyons of bolting lava, rock, magma, maybe even the seismac plates all along fault lines that are all connected underneath our earth's crust. Not 1 but 2 nuclear explosions could have totally stirred this seismac activity in Hawaii & Japan. Do you think that the earthquake is a reaction to action of the nuclear explosions?

2006-10-18 09:16:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Geography

10 answers

Atomic bombs were developed during WW2, and soon after the war, numerous tests were made, then during the 60s underground testing became the norm.

The frequency and intensity of earthquakes is notable since the early 60s.

We're treated like mushrooms (kept in the dark and fed alot of slnit) but you'll notice that the Nuclear Nonproliferation treaties since that time have outlawed underground testing. I believe the PTBs (powers that be) know about the relationship between earthquakes and underground testing and put the brakes on the testing for just that reason.

You've got to consider that the magnetic field of the earth is declining (like anything magnetic does) at the phenomenal rate of 5% a year!

Not only does water respond to magnetism (more so ice), but any rock strata containing ferrous compounds will as well.

As the magnetic field declines, those strata that found their position thousands of years ago due to conditions extant at that time are now under pressure due to the present day lack of magnetic field.

Upset the apple cart with the kind of power a nuclear device expends and the result is seen in the data as collected on earthquakes since the 60s.

Sorry if this conclusion is disturbing.
.

2006-10-18 09:23:20 · answer #1 · answered by s2scrm 5 · 2 0

The NK test registered 4 on the Richter scale.

There are dozens of Richter 4's a week.

Ritcher 5 is 10 times more powerful, 6 is 100 times and so on.

The Sumatran earthquake that produced Tsunami was hundreds of thousands of time as powerful.

I likened the NK test like a fart in the Empire State Building - it just produced a very local smell.

Get perspective folks. I am not defending the test, just showing you how miniscule it was in relation to the Earth.

2006-10-18 11:00:13 · answer #2 · answered by nick s 6 · 0 1

I thought Japan was hit with an earthquake a day or two after the N. Korea's nuclear test. I am not sure if the earthquake was confirmed; but if it was, it certainly is worth looking into.

2006-10-18 10:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by John Doe 1 · 1 0

in simple terms stop that deliver an look at it already...we've the criminal top to realize this...why arent we...are we that afriad of a few d^i^l^d^o with wacked out hair, dark glasses, and a pair nuclear weapons under his finger...Comeon, we are able to turn all of N Korea into the comparable high-quality ash that's interior the bottum of my charcoal grill

2016-11-23 18:02:51 · answer #4 · answered by cegla 4 · 0 0

we will never know. but that vision could be true. because i thought about the same thing. nuclear test happens. dayslater hawaii has these after shocks. reaching what 6.0's. same as the nuclears test.!? Mmmm?

2006-10-18 09:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by natetron 2 · 0 0

What nuclear explosion(s)? N Korea's? That wasn't but 1 kiloton. A little *poop*. It'd have to be a lot bigger and a lot deeper to have any (if any) effect.

2006-10-18 09:24:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes i really do feel like the nuclear explosion could have a lot to do with it.

2006-10-18 14:17:06 · answer #7 · answered by nicegirl2 2 · 1 0

I absolutly think there is a connection

2006-10-18 09:48:35 · answer #8 · answered by cougarbrooke08 2 · 1 0

we will never know

2006-10-18 09:23:28 · answer #9 · answered by antiekmama 6 · 0 0

no

2006-10-18 09:40:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers