2006-10-18 07:18:18 · 18 answers · asked by kaz 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I support both of them as divorce is traumatic time for both parties. I think that he married heather far too quickly after Linda died. He found his true love in Linda; both of them were free spirits, but from what I can make out Heather was overly possessive of him. And he is a Gemini so that would not suit him to be smothered.
Heather, Well I am not sure what to make of her. A woman that is lonely and not too popular with media does not happiness make. However, the divorce was a joint descision so I guess she'll get by on a meagre divorce settlement ha, ha!
It is the wee lass that I feel sorry for, she is going to be pulled from pillow to post you can just see it happening. No amount of money is going to compensate her. I think that as soon as she is old enough she will be packed off to boarding school and left to fend for herself.
2006-10-18 07:31:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paul he earned his money long before this money grabbing goldigger came along it makes me sick how can she be entitled to a lions share of money she made no contribution to earn he will look after his child and that's all he should have to do she is young and can work so why should he make her rich its sickening when you read things like this i have no problem if the other person has fully contributed but she hasn't and as so should get minimal payment a one off then sling her hook i cant believe now all of a sudden he is a wife beater rubbish if he was that would have come out along time ago total crap this woman is out to cause as much pain as she can i did feel sorry it had happened now i feel nothing but contempt for the woman she should go and go now as quietly as is now possible
2006-10-18 14:59:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
paul-although i think it must have been very difficult for heather stepping into that world and also trying to compete with the legacy of linda which must have been really difficult.pauls a fool and an old one at that,but i think that for her to accuse him of violence is a bit daft-hes been in the public eye for over 40 years and its never been raised before so i dont really believe it-and as for him having a few drugs and drinking a bit-for gods sake hes a rock n roll star-what did she think he was going to do!!also-i cant find it in myself to blame paul in this because he wrote helter skelter,blackbird,let it be,hey jude and who could forget the frog chorus!!i reckon heather will get a payout and access to the little one that we would all be happy with-and she will live in comfort for the rest of her life all at pauls expense-so i have to side with him on this
2006-10-18 14:26:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heather. Paul's a tool.
2006-10-18 14:19:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I support Paul all the way. Heather was money grabbing right from the start. I knew he never should have married her, I bet he does now having to fork out all that money.
2006-10-18 14:22:58 · answer #5 · answered by Jeanette 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Paul. Heather's a tool.
2006-10-18 14:20:34 · answer #6 · answered by jim 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Paul. He was manipulated and taken advantage of. Bet he wishes he had have went for the prenup like she offered. Thats why Paul is a tool.
2006-10-18 14:23:54 · answer #7 · answered by K 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Paul is insufferably smug - in many ways they seemed well suited to each other - but I have to say that her battle for billions is tasteless - it reinforces the idea that she could just be a goldigger. Just look at her past. But that's just my view - but she should have realised what she was getting into with the Least Talented Member of the Beatles......So I support Paul, - cos with such little talent he needs all the help he can get!
2006-10-18 14:24:29 · answer #8 · answered by Miss Behavin 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Paul the sad old nieve fool
2006-10-18 15:39:22 · answer #9 · answered by steve50 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He never should have married her in the first place and I think they're both getting what they deserve.
If I were his age with his money I would certainly have a very close relationship with a woman but I would never marry again.
2006-10-18 15:27:28 · answer #10 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋