2006-10-18 07:11:12 · 9 answers · asked by Ron T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
For what? That trumped up media charge about Valerie Plame? He didn't leak her name and everyone knew the whole time who it was. (Armitage)
2006-10-18 07:13:33 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He didn't do anything. They accused Karl Rove and the White House and Scooter Libby WAS indicted for "outing" an uncover CIA agent. She was never undercover in the first place! She was more or less a glorified secretary! The man in the defense department who WAS the leak, (I don't recall his name off hand) wasn't indicted. The Special Prosecutor who indicted Libby, knew EXACTLY who the leak was and KNEW when he indicted Libby that Libby wasn't the leak! When this election's over, the special prosecutor may be the one being indicted for malfeasance of office!
2006-10-18 07:47:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because either no grand jury heard a case against him, or they returned an order of "No true bill" as in there was not enough evidence to convict. Karl Rove isn't the problem anyway. He's an intelligent guy, who happens to look like the grandpa of the Pillsbury Dough-Boy. He seems kind of molester-like to me, but I don't know the guy and wouldn't want to. None of it matters, as it is a distraction. Had Gore or Kerry won, the same CFR reps would be in the Cabinet....that should prove that the dual political parties are simply mirror images of each other.
2006-10-18 07:17:35 · answer #3 · answered by Damien104 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the potential prosecutors lacked any evidence to present to a Grand Jury alleging that he committed a crime.
2006-10-18 07:20:26 · answer #4 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh.... because he didn't do anything. Why isn't Teddy Kennedy in prison for killing Mary Jo Kopecne and D.U.I. Liberals have such selective memories.
2006-10-18 07:14:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He didn't do anything, maybe you can explain why Armitage hasn't been indicted....
2006-10-18 07:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because there is no evidence against him...period!
Man! Keep up with the news, will you?
2006-10-18 07:29:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he is protected by the Pres. of the US. Someday it will all come out and it will be shocking.
2006-10-18 07:20:57 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he's a innocent
2006-10-18 07:15:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋