I assume you are referring to the North American Free Trade Agreement. While I will certainly agree that the US has lost jobs as a result of this pact, free trade is a cornerstone
of US foreign policy. Protectionist trade policies
usually harm the nation by increasing costs of goods and encouraging inefficient resource utilization. Some academics have noted that such polices played a significant role in the great depression.
2006-10-18 07:19:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by david42 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I forget the official name for it, and not sure if it is being seriously looked at, but the reason is meant to be security. To characterize it as an imprisonment union is incorrect. Considering we were safe from attack until 2001, but now the Continent's security has been breached, it is not that bad an idea. I would be willing to lose some personal freedoms for the safety of all. We have lots of lo-life terrorist looking dudes here in Canada who came here from God-knows where, and I've over-heard myself conversations of Muslims here in Vancouver talking about plotting an attack again....
2006-10-18 07:13:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by cbmaclean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it quite is stable thinking. notably on an financial open borders foundation -- no longer likely to artwork as a single political unit. Canada is already self sufficient -- considering that July a million, 1867. the aspects to contemplate are the great mineral & organic source wealth of Canada and Mexico; the similarity in ordinary values, histories, traditions; the Mexican exertions pool, as US and Canadian populations age. There are different concerns -- Hispanic family contributors shape is a lot extra healthy than that of maximum different N. A. subculture, Canadians have a international view that would not presume they are extra effective than all of us else, and the U.S. has the final mix of peoples of any u . s . a . in background. As to the completed hemisphere -- i do no longer see lots benefit gained that we could no longer gain as basically a N. A. union. surely Mexico and Miami are key aspects of Latin American financial infrastructure already.
2016-10-19 22:53:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by itani 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you fools
we should never lose any freedom
do not let the ethnic peoples in who are terrorist until they start say this guy could be a terrorist if they do not want to they dont come in look at what happened during ww ll maybe it should happen again with mulims yeah i know i dont believe in religious freedom but i do
why should all of north america pay for one group get rid of the group
2006-10-18 07:18:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Union busters they are. Determined to remove the upper middle class.
2006-10-18 07:09:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋