English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm not sure how to spell it, but it is where a woman gets her clitoris cut off.

2006-10-18 06:59:56 · 7 answers · asked by George 3 in Health Women's Health

I was talking to this guy once, and he said that his ex was held down by these 4 big guys and with a old (and maybe rusty) knife, got a clitrodectomy. He also told me to never look up pics on it. It's disturbing.

2006-10-18 07:13:35 · update #1

7 answers

Female genital cutting (FGC) refers to amputation of any part of the female genitalia for cultural rather than medical reasons. The term almost always excludes gender reassignment surgery, which is usually done for personal rather than cultural reasons, or genital modification of intersexuals.

Most Human rights organizations in the West, Africa, and Asia consider female genital cutting rituals a violation of human rights. Among these groups and governments, they are regarded as unacceptable and illegal forms of body modification and mutilation of those believed to be too young or otherwise unable to give informed consent.

The procedure was legally practiced by doctors in the United States until 1996, and is still common in many developing countries, some at rates exceeding 95%.

Opponents of these practices use the term female genital mutilation (FGM). The term female circumcision is also in common usage, though advocates of male circumcision argue that this results in unwanted associations between the two practices, while genital integrity advocates might refer to all child genital cutting as mutilation. Some intersexuals also argue that gender assignment surgery should be referred to as mutilation. The term encompasses a wide variety of practices some of which are frequently equated directly with male circumcision, others which involve a far greater level of cutting or mutilation and others yet which involve no real cutting or mutilation.

The expression “female genital mutilation” (FGM) gained growing support in the late 1970s. The word “mutilation” not only establishes a clear linguistic distinction with male circumcision, but also, due to its strong negative connotations, emphasizes the gravity of the act. In 1990, this term was adopted at the third conference of the Inter African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children (IAC) in Addis Ababa. In 1991, the World Health Organization recommended that the United Nations adopt this terminology and subsequently, it has been widely used in UN documents.

The use of the word “mutilation” reinforces the idea that this practice is a violation of the human rights of girls and women, and thereby helps promote national and international advocacy towards its abandonment. At the community level, however, the term can be problematic. Local languages generally use the less judgmental “cutting” to describe the practice; parents understandably resent the suggestion that they are “mutilating” their daughters. In this spirit, in 1999, the UN called for tact and patience regarding activities in this area and drew attention to the risk of “demonizing” certain cultures, religions and communities. As a result, the term “cutting” has increasingly come to be used to avoid alienating communities
Clitoridotomy
"Clitoridotomy" (which is also called "hoodectomy" as a slang term) involves the removal or splitting of the clitoral hood. The United Nations Population Fund states that this is comparable to male circumcision. In the United States and other Western countries, clitoridotomy is usually performed on adult women rather than on children. It is also known as Sunna circumcision (named after the Arabic word for anything approved by Islamic law and centred in Islamic tradition). However some Muslim clergy oppose all forms of Female genital cutting.

Islamic juridical logic cannot acknowledge the distinction between female and male circumcision, both being the mutilation of healthy organs which is damaging to the physical integrity of the child, whatever the underlying religious motivations. Furthermore, both practices violate the Koran:

Our Lord, You did not create all this in vain -(3:191)

[He] perfected everything He created -(32:7)

"In our opinion, a god who demands that his believers be mutilated and branded on their genitals the same as cattle, is a god of questionable ethics. To mutilate children, boys or girls, under the pretext that it is for their own good, shows the influence of cynicism and fanaticism."

Type I circumcision is defined by the World Health Organisation as clitoridotomy and perhaps excision of part or all of the clitoris (clitoridectomy; see following section). However, some authorsdefine type I as at least partial removal of the clitoris.

From the late 19th century until the 1950s, clitoridotomy and other more invasive procedures, including excision of the clitoris and infibulation were practiced in Western countries to control female sexuality, and were advocated in the United States by groups like the Orificial Surgery Society until 1925. Doctors advocating or performing these procedures claimed that girls of all ages would otherwise engage in more masturbation and be "polluted" by the activity, which was referred to as "self-abuse".

Through the 1950s, some doctors continued to advocate clitoridotomy for hygienic reasons or to reduce masturbation. For example, C.F. McDonald wrote in a 1958 paper titled Circumcision of the Female "If the male needs circumcision for cleanliness and hygiene, why not the female? I have operated on perhaps 40 patients who needed this attention." The author describes symptoms as "irritation, scratching, irritability, masturbation, frequency and urgency," and in adults, smegmaliths causing "dyspareunia and frigidity." The author then reported that a two-year old was no longer masturbating so frequently after the procedure. Of adult women, the author stated that "for the first time in their lives, sex ambition became normally satisfied." Justification of the procedure on hygienic grounds, or to reduce masturbation, has since declined. The view that masturbation is a cause of mental and physical illness has dissipated since the mid-20th century.

A few doctors and others advocate clitoridotomy of adults, promoting it as a way of increasing sexual sensitivity and sexual pleasure. One claim is that a large clitoral hood may make stimulation of the clitoris difficult. Websites promoting the practice like Circlist, BMEzine, and geocities contain testimonials and two of them provide summaries of medical studies, including several finding that the majority of women reported improved sensation following the procedure (for example, 87.5% in Rathmann's 1959 study and 75% in Knowles').

Clitoridectomy means the partial or total removal of the external part of the clitoris. It was sometimes practiced in English-speaking nations well after the first half of the Twentieth Century, ostensibly to stop masturbation. . Blue Cross Blue Shield paid for clitoridectomies in the U.S.A. until May 18, 1977 . Clitoridectomy is still being practiced in isolated instances. It is, however, quite common in many countries of sub-Saharan Africa, east-Africa, Egypt, Sudan, and the Arabian Peninsula.

Type II circumcision is more extensive than type I, meaning clitoridectomy and sometimes also removal of the labia minora.

Neurectomy, or severing of the pubic nerve to permanently numb the genitals and approximate the effect of a clitoridectomy was performed on institutionalized girls and women around the turn of the 20th Century in America and Australia, and electrical cauterization of the clitoris was reported to have been occasionally performed on mental patients in the USA to stop them from masturbating as recently as 1950.

The kind of things that sometimes happened to girls and women were documented in Alex Comfort's book, "The Anxiety Makers", Panther Edition, London, 1968:

About 1858, Dr Isaac Baker Brown, later president of the Medical Society of London, introduced the operation of clitoridectomy for the consequences of what he coyly calls 'peripheral excitement'. These, in his view, included epilepsy, hysteria and the convulsive disorders generally (page 109). In 1866 Brown published a series of 48 of such cases. This caused what Comfort called an 'almighty row'. Dr Baker Brown was ejected from the Obstetrical Society. Comfort says (page 111) that 'clitoridectomy fortunately disappeared from England'. However, it was taken up in the United States:
In 1894, we find Dr. Eyer of the St. John's Hospital, Ohio, dealing with nervousness and masturbation in a little girl by cauterizing the clitoris; this failing, a surgeon was called in to bury it with silver wire sutures - which the child tore and resumed the habit. The entire organ was then excised, with the crura. Six weeks after the operation the patient is reported as saying, 'You know there is nothing there now, so I could do nothing.' (Comfort, ibid, page 111)
Comfort says that this concern about masturbation 'did not really die out completely until the 1940s with the statistical studies of Kinsey' (Comfort, ibid, page 119)

2006-10-18 07:03:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Are you referring to female circumcision? It's done in some parts of Africa and the middle east. Its a cruel practice used as a puberty ritual or earlier. Its to make the woman less likely to roam and to make her faith full to her husband. Also to make the area more pleasing to look at. The clitoris and the folds are removed sometimes with a piece of broken glass. It causes many health problems the worst is that scar tissue doesn't stretch so during child birth these women tear something awful requiring hundreds of stitches. Infection is also a problem and in some parts of the world this is done without anesthesia with a adult female relative holding the child down. BARBARIC!!!

2006-10-18 07:08:31 · answer #2 · answered by bramblerock 5 · 0 0

Women do not get this operation themselves. It is a third-world procedure because MEN try to control women and their sexuality.m It is an extremely painful and disfiguring procedure that leads to chronic infection, etc...

2006-10-18 07:02:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

who knows why anyone would do it by choice. in other countries its done b/c thats what they think is right... but anyone who dose it by choice is crazy!

2006-10-18 07:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who does that???????? In other cultures it is done but to do it by choice....I find that out of the question.

2006-10-18 07:01:25 · answer #5 · answered by sideways 7 · 0 1

Gerogre, did that really happen?

2016-02-09 20:11:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

eh??

2006-10-18 07:01:20 · answer #7 · answered by Ray 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers