Are the established political parties becoming outdated/ irrelevent?

Question

Do we need a new party and what would it be like?

Answer 1

We don't need parties at all. There has never been a time that Political Parties served the will of US citizens. They have allways sought to increase the power of speical interrests against the will of the people. When's the last time you heared a the words Democrat or Republican when not in connection with a scandal?

Answer 2

Im an irish person and when i look at the american system i always find it unusual. In ireland we have 2 significent parties, 2 smallish parties that hold the balance of power and a few smaller some what insignicent parties. Because of this there is rarely an occasion when 1 party holds absoulute power and the government knows that if they make an unpopular desision they could be out the next day if the party there in collisition with refuses to bac them up. Its not a perfect system but it works a lot better.

Answer 3

No, I don't think that it will work to establish any political party's at this time. What is needed is for new people, young ones in particular to pick a party and work to improve it. It is not the party's fault it is the people that are running it. Working from within is probably the best way to go about it.

Answer 4

What we need is a new system of campaign finance reform. Politicians should not be allowed to receive money from any corporation, entity, or person. We don't need to see them on TV lying to us about what the stand for. They need to be ask US what needs to be done because they are OUR employees. Congress just gave the lowest one year pay raise to our troops in Iraq while they passed a hidden $20 Million Fund for a 2007 Iraqi Victory Party for politicians and their special interest supporters. The corruption has reached a level where any good patriot MUST intervene.

Answer 5

Both parties are corrupt. They are elected by the people but when they get to Washington represent their party, not the people. The parties in turn take vast sums of cash from corporations, special interests and lobbyists.

The national parties instruct their minions, the congressmen elected by us to represent us, to craft legislation favoring the groups that donated money to the parties, not to help the constituents who elected them.

The voters need to elect third party candidates who will break the lock that the Republcians and Democrats have on special interest money and corporate sponsorship. This will have the effect of giving the government back to the people.

Answer 6

they were pretty much irrelevent after day one. Its just a way of getting people to vote along party lines, if you feel strongly enough about something you will put all your eggs in one basket, which is no way to run a country. There are other parties, greens, independants, etc that have had a part to play. like if it werent for nader gore might have won, but then again bush's daddy had stacked the supreme court deck pretty well.

Answer 7

Yes, we need a Green Party that can actually win elections. HOwever, I am currently a Democratic Party activist and I have to tell my Green folks that sometimes you have to pick the lesser of the evils.
If you want to vote for the Republicans, then vote Green. Why? Until we have in place a legal way for the vote to go to my 2nd choice if my 1st choice doesn't win, then voting for a 3rd Party just splits the vote off from the Republicans or Democrats (whichever party your 3rd party is closest to in philosophy).

Answer 8

We need new, intelligent people of high moral standard to run the political parties already in existence. Due to the dirty tricks, lies and general destruction caused by both parties and the media no one with any honor or intelligence wants to get involved.

Answer 9

The Church of britain isn't a democracy. it quite is a theocracy and takes its lead from the Archbishop. the pinnacle of the Church is the monarch of the day. The C of E become obliged to remark because of the fact the BNP used a poster depicting Jesus and suggesting Christians could vote for the BNP. i think of it lifelike to project that poster and say out top that it's not the call of the church to inspire its congregation to vote for companies seen to be divisive in nature. certainly this Sunday is the day that the pentecost (the introduction of the Christian church is nicely known) on that day some 2,000 years in the past the Holy Spirit descended on the disciples and among different skills gave them the capacity to handle a huge crowd of establishment human beings speaking a super style of languages of their own language/dialects. That become an act signifying unification of diverse peoples again to a minimum of one God and renew their faith in one God. pink monk you recognize i'm arranged to admire anyones' perspectives and believe they could desire to be allowed to hold them, yet I do additionally believe interior the final of respond. The church become addressed as an company representing Christians with the declare Christians could vote for the BNP, subsequently the Church could desire to be allowed to assert that Jesus would not have executed so and to deter its congregation from doing so. i could upload that I even have not heard the recent Catholic Archbishop complaining with regard to the poster in basic terms the C of E so possibly not all Christian companies are unfavorable?

Answer 10

It's not that we need a new party- that would simply be compounding the current problems. We need a whole new system of politics- one that more clearly reflects the needs of todays society- I'd suggest something like the ancient Roman tribunal system, combine it with the current Finnish legal system and work on it from there.