2006-10-18 06:11:27 · 23 answers · asked by me 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would ruin their chances of winning the election and everyone would finally know the demoRATS are a big lie.
2006-10-18 06:14:19 · answer #1 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Im somewhat perplexed by ability of your source so a techniques. whilst i attempted to click on the source linkes under the viewer comments, i ended up at a weblog. That weblog had what you published be conscious for be conscious and a source link. as quickly as I clicked on that source link, it sent me decrease back on your webstie. That got here approximately 3 greater cases. the place did this initially come from? It does not sound like something I truthfully have even seen a Soldier do after 12 years of provider and 5 deployments. i'm no longer rapidly announcing that's BS. i could like to work out a source for this different then blogs and a black and white website that circle on one yet another on the grounds that that's the 1st I truthfully have heard of this.
2016-10-02 10:30:09 · answer #2 · answered by milak 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would not be killing each other if George W Bush had not made the decision to invade. It doesn't matter who's pulling the trigger or setting off the bomb. Neither would be happening if Bush hadn't set off a chain of events in motion that led to anarchy. The United States is morally responsible for creating a situation that the Iraqi's are stuck in. Why don't you care about that?
2006-10-18 06:23:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know what?...
It was a Conservative Administration, not Liberal, that got us into Iraq and began all this violence. Before they did, Iraqi's did have a better life than they do now. Saddam might be a tyrant but at least he kept Iraq stable!
If this is suppose to be a War on terror, why is it that you rarely ever hear about Afghanistan in the media, anymore? This mess in Iraq is because Bush wanted revenge for his Daddy!
2006-10-18 07:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by MSJP 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They do care. Death is death whether it is an American soldier or Iraqi citizen, whether the killer is American or Iraqi. It doesn't matter who is killing or being killed, the point is that people are constantly being killed in a war that was declared over in 2003.
2006-10-18 06:16:18 · answer #5 · answered by sctiger3 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No they are killed in the war fraudulently started by Americans.
It does not matter which side fired the shots because Bush destabilized the country and the terrorist organizations did not exist in Iraq before we invaded. These 650,000 civilians would still be alive had we not invaded.
So yes our government IS responsible for their deaths.
Bush should be on trial for the massacre that he created.
During the entire time of Saddam's rule the death count was 140,000.
2006-10-18 06:22:08 · answer #6 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually I think it DOES matter that Iraqis are killing each other... BECAUSE IRAQ IS COMPLETELY DESTABLIZED RIGHT NOW!!!!! IRAQ is now embroiled in civil war...
GOD!!!!! use your head to think just ONE time!
poeple who once had neighborhoods and electricity live in bombed out husks wondering when a death squad is going to come knock down the door. If you aren't one of the few people holding out hopes that the US can defend you then your probably one of the people who are up in arms to protect thier families or get back at the people who you think ruined your life... that or maybe youd be a bastardly insurgent... either way sh*t over there ain't pretty and we might be trying to help... but we're partially responsible for the way things are right now.
2006-10-18 06:20:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
My strong stance against illegal immigration could disqualify me as a liberal. However, I do feel that discussion about the death toll on Iraqi citizens is an important issue, regardless of whether or not our soldiers or bombs killed them. It is this war against Iraq that the Bush administration lied to get us into that is causing more civil unrest between the Sunis and the Shiites (sp). Otherwise, the bodies of the Iraqi soldiers and police forces wouldn't have been strung out in rows for our armed forces to find. They are sending us a message to get out, so yes, this administration is responsible for the death toll. Every day in the news we hear of the body counts of our soldiers and the innocent civilians who are being massacred. Neither our media or our government are bothering to keep count of the citizens being killed as a direct result of this unjust war. I think the news networks should be keeping a tally of the deaths they report so we can get a real grip on the number of people who are dead because our greedy president decided to waste our military resources on a country proven not to have WMD while N. Korea and Iran continue to proliferate them. According to your conservative views, it is okay to support Hasert who covered up child sexual abuse by his subordinate. It is okay to keep shipping our dead soldiers home from Iraq. It is okay to ignore the nuclear threat from Iran and N Korea by a president who refuses to even pronounce the word nuclear properly. It is okay to ignore our govt.s role in the death toll of innocent citizens who never asked for our presence in their country. It is okay to torture people based soley on suspicion with no evidence to support that they are guilty of anything. It is okay to be in power for 6 years and yet not enforce a single immigration law in our own country or to protect our borders. If it's liberal to refuse to support these policies that are so self destructive to our country, then call me a flaming lib.
2006-10-18 06:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one is saying that all the 650,000 Iraqi civilian deaths were all caused by Americans.
Years of sanctions did kill a lot of people, because the sanctions didn't work. They never hurt the people in power, just the citizens.
2006-10-18 06:20:56 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably because they're pointing out how horrific the situation is, not assigning blame. If they wanted to use the deaths for political gain they'd be connecting each death to President Bush's policies.
2006-10-18 06:16:32 · answer #10 · answered by W0LF 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The 650,000 Iraqi death estimate is a bald faced lie.
2006-10-18 06:59:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋