while the Iraq war isn't yet four years old it will be by all predictions before we begin a troop reduction, it accomplished little for our homw land security, after all Saddem may have been a lunatic, but he was no threat to us, we should of gone after Bin Ladden instead! But no hes tied to the Saudi's who incidently have a tyrant ruler, a horrible human rights record, but they are our frined, friends who brought down the twin towers, attacked the pentagon, and financed Bin Ladden, and continue to do so today while they hold us hostiage at the pump! Just say no to repbulicans!
2006-10-18 06:06:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
This war will not be ended in the next couple decades, regardless of who is in charge. Personally, I do not want democrats in office during this time of war because they don't have what it takes to be tought enough to continue. Maybe if they were still the old dems (ie Truman type) they would, but not todays dems.
2006-10-18 13:07:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by letitcountry 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
We can sit here and spin quotes from the past all day, I hate to upset you but the Democrats are no better than the Republicans in this country.
2006-10-18 13:04:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
A party that has stopped numerous attacks on the U.S. deserves to be re-elected.
2006-10-18 13:02:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by only p 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
I don't find it neither tasteful nor useful to quote from Assholes.
2006-10-18 13:16:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by foundationshaker 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
we shouldn't and they know it, that's why you are seeing all of the name calling and distractions, so that people forget to focus on the real issues.
2006-10-18 13:02:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by pip 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
thank God this administration has stopped any further attacks...
2006-10-18 13:45:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
1⤋