This might seem silly but I would like a broader opinion. My friends and I have been conducting a survey and I'm going to kill her if I'm wrong. Please don't say both.
2006-10-18 05:59:25 · 9 answers · asked by Heather 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
Jack and Jill were ficticious characters in a childern's nursery rhyme. Believe it or not they are not real characters and therefore are neither siblings or lovers. Just leave it as it is. An innocent child's story.
2006-10-18 06:02:14 · answer #1 · answered by tommygirl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jack and Jill went up the hill,
We know what Jack was after,
Atop the hill, Jack had Jill,
Now she has got a daughter.
Not siblings.................
2006-10-18 13:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought they were school chums.
But now seeming to recall that their parents appeared in some of the primer stories?
Aloha
2006-10-18 13:08:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think jack and jill were siblings
2006-10-18 16:50:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
THAT is a sordid story of incest masquerading as chore doing. It is about time that someone call this story what it is; a manifesto for incest. Thank you. thank you, thank you for reminding us of this wickedness and the attendant penalties for that wickedness in the form of head injuries.
2006-10-18 13:05:15 · answer #5 · answered by cirdellin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I get the impression they were brother and sister, I would almost bet that they are suppose to be. Hope this helps some.
2006-10-18 13:01:45 · answer #6 · answered by ♥USMCwife♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought they were siblings.
2006-10-18 13:04:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't kill, just a nursery rhyme---i always thought siblings...
2006-10-18 13:06:44 · answer #8 · answered by phyllis_neel 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Siblings.....Geez, don't you have anything better to do?
2006-10-18 13:07:37 · answer #9 · answered by startwinkle05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋