English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

pattern here ? What ever happened to the Buck stops here, oh my that was a democrat, Nuke em to Hell Harry!

2006-10-18 05:51:26 · 13 answers · asked by Frank R 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

Responsibility stops the second they take the oath of office, after that its lame excuses and covering up! Foley and John Carr need to see the inside of an execution chamber since there is no known cure for pedophila

2006-10-18 06:26:16 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1 1

LBJ was to blame for escalating the Vietnam War.
Carter's economy sucked ***. Reagan's boomed.
Bush doesn't blame Clinton for anything, except not doing enough to get bin Laden, though no one could've foreseen he would wreak so much havoc. The recession of early in Bush's term did start in early 2000, though. Do some research.

Foley is disgusting. It may be that a priest molested him and maybe even made him gay, but he has to take responsibility for his messages (note, not actions, as he didn't physically molest anyone).

2006-10-18 05:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by Lawn Jockey 4 · 0 0

And Democrats blame Republicans. It's all a big game. Blame the other side for whatever is bad going on.

2006-10-18 05:55:16 · answer #3 · answered by Mutt 7 · 1 0

Everybody blames everybody else. I'm a democrat by nature but Democrats do it to, the buck never stops anywhere because then the supporters of the opponent would latch onto it and never let it go. Its the nature of politics.

2006-10-18 05:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Carter did away with the Glass- Steagal Act which gave the banks the capacity to alter into the two Commerical and investment banks on a similar time under one roof... which replaced into why the 1st melancholy handed off and replaced into positioned into place actual after to maintain it from happening... So Carter maximum surely opened the door for what's happening right this moment. It allowed companies alongside with AIG to get too vast to fail... throughout Reagan's years because of the fact the banks began merging into the conglomerates that they are right this moment observed that taking mortgages and making them into securities replaced right into a worthwhile subject. Which it replaced into. (it quite is what Clinton used to push his housing for each individual deal) Clinton took those securities and observed that a ton of money could desire to be made and felt that the money could desire to be positioned in direction of ensuring the loans for the banks for unqualified shoppers via Fanny Mae and Freddie Mack. (The replaced into the initiating of the Bubble) Bush Sr. - to be ordinary different than no longer doing something i individually do no longer comprehend how vast of a place he had. Bush Jr. - the bubble popped on him... no longer using his rules, yet using timing. basically like the commerical realestate is going to pop on Obama. dazzling Blame is on Congress although... there are 545 human beings in Congress that make the guidelines and are in finished administration. whilst they % something to ensue, it takes place... frightening yet actual.

2016-10-19 22:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by mchellon 4 · 0 0

I don't believe this stuff about Foley and the Priest for a minute. I believe they'll come up with someone deceased so it can't be traced back to the supposed "offender".

And yes, you're right-what about taking responsibility?

2006-10-18 09:47:05 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

Latest pattern is - Republicans blame Republicans!

2006-10-18 05:55:27 · answer #7 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1 0

Maybe there is some truth in there blaming the demos. Remember when Carter handed Iran over the the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979?

2006-10-18 06:03:02 · answer #8 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0 3

Yep, but Republicans aren't very good at spotting patterns, otherwise they might have realized how much Iraq resembles Vietnam!

2006-10-18 05:54:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well Carter was weak in his policies about the Iranian hostage crisis, Clinton didn't do anything to pursue the terrorists after the WTC bombing '93

Well, I guess the point in politics is to blame each other

2006-10-18 05:55:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers