English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would we end up with effectively NO military if the liberals had their way? they seem totally uninterested in national security, its like they expect the whole world to just leave us alone if we had no defence, thats naive. maybe they want other countries to take over. they arent expected to give away all their liberties for national security, but what do you want to hide if a guy calls you 4 times a day from syria? its not like the government wants to or can listen to everyone. its logistically impossible to listen to every phone call in the country.
how would democrats have it? no security, no military, appeasement for all, let non-citizens vote? ya thats all we need, to let "taliban nationals" to vote.

2006-10-18 04:35:52 · 8 answers · asked by kunta kinte 2 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

i agree with you 100%.. liberals live in a dream world.. they think that "we" are the cause of terrorism but forget the fact that they hated us in the first place! yeah.. so if we don't do anything to them they'll just give up their Jihad against us.. MY ***!!! we must defend ourselves against these people! we cannot assume the position! on the issue of listening in on phone calls.. If you aren't doing anything wrong then why do you care? I don't talk to terrorists so they can listen in as much as they want.. they may get bored by what they're hearing but i don't really mind! I can't wait to see how all the liberals are gonna piss and moan about your question! have a good one man!

2006-10-18 04:43:29 · answer #1 · answered by comemychildren 2 · 1 1

Doesn't the sheer stupidity of their political beliefs just make you angry or are you past that stage and now just resigned to the eventual take over of our nation in a short time after the left wing fascists gain control?

2006-10-18 12:08:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

kreevich- that's the problem they are not speaking, they only say, "vote for me I'm not Bush" they have no real plans, and if there are ones that do they are not allowed to speak because they are held down by the Soros controlled radicals that controll the party. Sorry Democratic party of old is dead, it a well funded special interest group now.

2006-10-18 11:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 1 0

You sure have created a Straw Man version of the Democratic Party. Instead of listening to other hysterics define the Democrats, let them speak for themselves. Coem back to reality.

2006-10-18 11:38:55 · answer #4 · answered by kreevich 5 · 0 2

Anyone remember the 90's????? What do you think America...are we better off with bush compaired to clinton?? Is screwing and intern really worse then screwing the entire country/world?

2006-10-18 11:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by Franklin 7 · 0 1

No, the liberal way is to have war only when it is absolutelty necessary and when the President is being forthcoming and truthful about the reasons for war.

2006-10-18 11:42:06 · answer #6 · answered by brian2412 7 · 0 2

For someone who no longer chooses to live in this country you sure have a big mouth!!

2006-10-18 11:53:32 · answer #7 · answered by Gettin_by 3 · 0 1

I say we toss them into the volcano before they give it all away.

2006-10-18 11:38:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers