I have read answer after answer from mis-informed Republicans saying that the U.N. approved the U.S.'s requests regarding North Korea sanctions.
The truth is that Robert Bolton went to the U.N. and requested for the U.N. to join in the United State's desire for military action to be taken NOW against North Korea.
The U.N. took a vote and decided that no military action was warrented and that only sanctions are in order at this time.
Why all the ignorance, Republicans?
Been watching FOX News again?
2006-10-18 03:58:37 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sorry, that should have been John Bolton, but what's the difference? You all knew who I meant.
2006-10-18 04:38:29 · update #1
Sanctions are like saying we won't feed your hungry anymore.
Military action is a declaration of war.
2006-10-18 04:39:57 · update #2
Twisted facts is the agenda of the GOP. See Iraq war pretense, see "tax cuts" for the American families, just to name few.
The GOP is the party of the billionaires who managed to fool the dumb and religious right into believing them.
2006-10-18 04:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Didn't you just disprove your own thesis? "The UN took a vote and decided that no military action was warranted and that only sanctions are in order at this time." Also according to you, that is what GOP posters are saying. Military action isn't a sanction. Besides, everyone knows the old diplomacy game. Always ask for more than you want so that when they settle on something less, its what you wanted in the first place.
2006-10-18 04:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please state your source of this information concerning Robert Bolton. If you can't then stop with the lies. Are you upset that the UN voted to take sanctions regarding North Korea's illegal actions concerning nuclear weaponry? No one said the UN gave the US every thing they asked for. What was said was that they agreed with the sanctions. You yourself state this in the first sentence beneath your question.
2006-10-18 04:02:55 · answer #3 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the UN did aprove the sanctions, this is what we claim, i dont see a twisting of facts, however there is always
" I smoked but i did not inhale"
"it depends on what your definition of is is"
"I was for the war before I was against it"
surely these are in no way shape or form a twisting of facts, that the gullible democrats ate up, been watching to much CNN I see
2006-10-18 04:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of you're puzzled with reference to the definition of info. we could desire to pass toe to toe over this and argue with reference to the certainty that liberals attempt to think of with their coronary heart (or a minimum of look that they do) that's in all probability no longer an surprising thought whilst it is the strategies that's ultimate acceptable. yet i detect it is a waste of time. And as a conservative/libertarian i'm all approximately effective and significant ideas. What i could element out to you is the certainty that my philosophy would not % you. As somebody who believes in voluntary, mutually effective relationships we would do wonderful putting apart from you statists thoroughly. you may fail miserably from 2 aspects. First from the shortcoming of hosts on your parasitic relationship and 2nd by using having an occasion of what works (thoroughly opposite of your philosophy) that persons could desire to get away to. Dumping collectivist poison right into a device that used to artwork is in no way the respond. you may desire to constantly ask your self why do you care if one section would not enact your recent collectivist dumb thought? in case you incredibly are the logical answer, the gang that would not pay for and incorporate your recent dumb thought could be at an obtrusive disadvantage wandering farther and farther faraway from the socialist, collectivist nirvana you promise. Logically it may replace into further and extra obtrusive which you have been actual, actual? in case you incredibly accompanied good judgment, this one certainty could subject you to no end and lead you to the tip I already have arrived at. you're a gadget and your philosophy won't be able to supply what you're saying it may. it is the main illogical place a individual can take.
2016-10-19 22:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are sanctions and military actions the same thing?
2006-10-18 04:09:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never heard that the request was for military action. Where's your source?
Why is it that you don't provide your unbiased sources for this kind of information? Is it because you don't have any? Or is it because you just like to lie about republicans?
2006-10-18 04:04:22 · answer #7 · answered by Da Judge 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do you get all of your twisted facts from CNN, the Communist News Network?
You want war in North Korea? I thought you libs were anti war?
2006-10-18 04:02:39 · answer #8 · answered by buffman316 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who is Robert Bolton? Do you mean JOHN Bolton?
Nice link to "prove" your claim
You don't even know the man's name!!
Typical for a liberal though
2006-10-18 04:02:12 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Depends how deep the hole is dug (lies). Cover up and misdirection is always the result.
2006-10-18 04:05:06 · answer #10 · answered by edubya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋