Let's for fun say that the white people of South Africa decided that they wanted to retake political power in that country. They begin guerilla warfare tactics in an effort to disrupt and dismattle the democratic system in that country. U.N. peace keepers rush in to try to quell the violence, but sadly are unable to keep many black South Africans from being killed by these unreasonable guerilla warriors. Are the U.N. peace keepers the murders? Did they start the sectarian violence?
Why would you condemn the U.S. in Iraq for fighting agaist racism if you wouldn't condemn the U.N. in that situation? Do liberals love racism that they don't support our policing effort in Iraq? Do you think we are so much more evolved than Iraqis that we can get past sectarian violence but they can't? Does that make liberals racists?
2006-10-18 03:33:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nix: Shiite vs. Sunni muslims. The "sectarian" violence is very similar to racism if not the exact same thing. People need to realize what we're fighting against.
2006-10-18 03:39:11 · update #1
It is not a racial problem, it is a political problem. It is not a religious problem, it is a political problem! Don't confuse them. The problems in South Africa were racist, but Iraq is not racist, it is political. Let's take another example; The Karen people of Myanmar are being systematically slaughtered by the Junta controlling the country and the UN does nothing!...or previously, the Khymer Rouge in Cambodia murdering about 1/3 of their own people...about 3-4 million....did the UN do anything?, or Somalia, or so many other places. The problems come from greed, the need for power and foreign interference. Eliminate the word 'racism' and think of the political motivations. Eliminate the word 'secular' and think about the politics. You are casting aspersions on both the UN and other nations with the pallid cry of racism. Racism does exist but it doesn't foster suicide bombers...but politics do. Religious differences exist but that doesn't bomb schools or hospitals but politics do.
2006-10-18 03:58:35 · answer #1 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah That's A Bad Situation You Got Yourself Into. You Could Get Yourself Into Big Trouble. That Is Considered Rape He Is Way Older Than You. You Probably Cant Stop Thinking About Him Because You Liked The Feeling Of Him When He Kissed You. But He Probably Only Did That Because He Was Drunk. Most Older Guys Stay Away From Younger Girls Around Your Age And Wouldn't Think About Kissing Them. You Cant Remember What He Looks Like Probably Because You Don't Know Him And It Probably Happened Really Fast. Maybe You Should Try To Forget About This And Move On. And Don't Get Yourself Into A Situation Like This Again. You Wouldn't Want To Get In Trouble For Hooking Up With An Older Guy. Hope i Helped.
2016-05-21 23:26:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
America never invaded Iraq to stop an on-going situation of minorities trying to terrorise. You invaded a country, the UN have not. If you can't understand even that simple fact, then all I've heard about the American Education system is true. How nice to know that America has no racial problems, as you suggest with your scenerio; strange how 3 out of 4 questions on this site are insulting Arabs, Mexicans, Europeans; and what about your own Deep South with its brotherly love. When will America have a president who isn't a white man?
Strangely, even George W, who changes his mind about why you went into Iraq on an hourly basis, hasn't claimed the US went into Iraq to stop racism!
2006-10-18 03:45:11 · answer #3 · answered by SteveUK 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What does racism have to do with the war in Iraq. Oil. Pure and simple.
2006-10-18 03:36:07 · answer #4 · answered by Nix 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The white people are the bad people.
2006-10-18 03:34:38 · answer #5 · answered by crazybrunette1991 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋