2006-10-18 03:30:17 · 30 answers · asked by Shiraz!! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bush is exaclty like hitler trying to get rid of muslims b/c of their fauith and their oil, what the matter can' ask no more stupid questions huh , level 1 you stupid moron
2006-10-18 03:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by marco 1 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Wow, tough one.
All three are/were evil megalomaniacs.
I hate to say it but, since Clinton killed less than 20 people who interfered with his rise to and retention of power (well at least that we know about. I am sure the media has covered up most of Clinton's dirty deeds.), and since Stalin and Hitler each killed millions of people who did not fit into their societal goals. I will have to say Stalin and Hitler are worse.
It's funny though, people generally regard Hitler as being far worse than Stalin. This is because Hitler has been painted as a right wing fascist, even though he was a left wing socialist, but anything that is right wing is automatically evil and bad.
Stalin kill many more people than Hitler did, but since he has been categorized as a leftist communist he is bad but not evil just misunderstood.
And people say the media and academia are not liberal, left wing organizations.
Ha! What a joke!
2006-10-18 11:57:14 · answer #2 · answered by TheMayor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just to clear up something...
Hitler and Stalin killed MILLIONS!!!!!
Shall we throw in Mao Tse-tung(sp?) and all the folks starving to death in Africa and North Korea?
May I ask what Clinton has to do with any of this?
2006-10-18 10:37:23 · answer #3 · answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All of Clinton's skeletons are falling out of closets everywhere. He has hurt this country in so many ways it is ridiculous. So, if not worse than at least the same as these other hate mongers.
2006-10-18 10:36:06 · answer #4 · answered by buffman316 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never knew Stalin & Hitler were perverts, I guess Clinton has more in common with them than I thought!!
2006-10-18 10:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
In what alternative universe is this a valid question? I fear for your sanity.
You obviously despise Clinton, but if given a choice, would you vote for or Stalin to run America instead? Things went pretty good under Clinton, despite constant Republican obstruction and sabotage.
2006-10-18 10:33:26 · answer #6 · answered by kreevich 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I'm not American, Russian or German, but I think the way to answer this one is to check on how many deaths for which each was responsible.
I think you'll find Bill is quite a lillywhite person!
2006-10-18 10:36:20 · answer #7 · answered by avian 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Hitler and Stalin killed thousands.
If you are measuring this on the basis of deaths, Bush is.
2006-10-18 10:31:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Get over Clinton and be mad at Bush
6 years unopposed by congress and you blame clinton
Ignorance is common in your party
2006-10-18 10:38:34 · answer #9 · answered by republicans are fake 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You did mean to say Bush didn't you? Clinton? The budged surplus, the good economy, the pre wrong war days.. yeah you had to mean Bush
2006-10-18 10:32:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hell no. He was the best president of all time. The Monica Lewinski scandal-Beautiful. Now George Bush that's another story.
2006-10-18 10:33:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋