English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I use to live in Pheonix and now I live in Chicago. I haven't been there in a few years but I know that it was just luck that the Bears won that game. They were cocky and the Cardnals deffense was right in Rex Grosemans face when they snapped the ball. But when Dennis Green had that Tirade on the air, and then turned around and Fired the Offensive Coordinator, I had to wonder what the hell was going on. Is Green stupid? The Cardnals Offense was doing pretty good when they played the Bears. The Bears Deffense and dumb luck save them from a Game that by all rights was the Cardnals to take. What's Greens Problem?

P.S. I know I have a lot of spelling errors, please don't point it out, answer the question please.

2006-10-17 21:00:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

8 answers

Alot of spelling errors doesnt quite describe that paragraph...but anyways....

The Bears winning that game was not dumb luck at all, it was the Bears defense doing what it does best. Its not "luck" that Leinart/James each lost a fumble that resulted in a TD and its not "luck" that the Bears special teams came up with huge blocks and Devin Hester did what he drafted by the Bears to do, return punts for TD's. That game showed the difference between a great NFL team and a horrible NFL team. The Bears came up BIG when it had to although starting off bad and even playing bad all game on offense they found other ways to win. The Cardinals started off hot but found ways to lose, the Cardinals outplayed the Bears and even at the Cardinals absolute best, they couldnt beat the Bears at their absolute worse. Dennis Green is a moron and he's a terrible coach. He had good years in Minnesota but only b/c the QB (Cunningham, Culpepper) knew what to do and that was to throw the ball deep to Moss...what happened in the playoffs though? They were disappointing (similar to Colts now). Now Green is criticizing the Bears?? LoL ok that makes sense. Firing the offensive coordinator just b/c his PLAYERS blew the game? LoL he's a jackass...you dont fire your offensive coordinator b/c your freaking team lost 2 fumbles for TD's and gave up a punt return for a TD, you rip the players asses. Green doesnt have a clue what he's doing when it comes to handling the players/coaches.

2006-10-17 22:28:15 · answer #1 · answered by speefmoney4 3 · 0 0

For me the question is do the Cardinals followers imagine Jim Johnson (protecting coordinator for the Eagles) is stupid sufficient to in hardship-free words rush 4 for the entire first 1/2? also look on the Cardinals record -vs- communities which finished the three hundred and sixty 5 days between the authentic 10 protecting communities (they have confronted 6 Patriots, Vikings, Cowboys, Redskins, Eagles, Giants). They gained one among those video games and that develop into through distinctive feature of a blocked punt and Tony Romo getting injured. No i do no longer imagine lots of the casual followers who're declaring the Cardinals will win are wondering obviously (or they are not responsive to the info). the in hardship-free words way the Cardinals win this recreation is an similar way they gained the Panthers recreation. a million) Kurt Warner receives all day to throw the ball contained in the first 1/2 (which will *by no skill* ensue hostile to a Jim Johnson coached protection). 2) The Eagles develop into one dimensional and in hardship-free words look to bypass the ball. With the Eagles protection that's not likely that the Cardinals will be able to construct a huge lead and the Cardinals protection isn't strong sufficient to make the Eagles one dimensional on their personal. 3) The Eagles make 3 or better turnovers. conceivable yet not likely and with out #a million or #2 that should not be sufficient. i do no longer see how the Cardinals can win this one. notwithstanding, I stated a similar aspect very last week. the version this week is that Jim Johnson is such an aggressive protecting coordinator he will basically no longer supply Warner the time -- no longer like the Panthers did.

2016-10-16 05:23:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't understand people saying this isn't Denny Greens fault. Their oline is atrocious, and DG is responsible for every player on it except Leonard Davis, who he moved to left tackle(where he's been terrible, apparently). The only good player on that line is a RG(Reggie Wells). Everyone else is terrible. The line is why they couldn't get any running going and also why they coughed up the ball twice.

And Denny Green has never been good. He's like Marty in a way....he's good in the regular season, but once he hits the playoffs, he can't win. My guess is that he's just not imaginative enough. He always does things the same exact way, and that can work in the regular season if it works well enough. But the postseason? Forget it. You have to hit on all cylinders or you go home. That simple. And Denny's teams have never hit on all cylinders...just the passing attack, so it's easy to shut them down, Just ask the 8 teams that dominated the Vikings in the playoffs way back when...

Oh, and DG makes bizarre decisions with certain personnel, and, IMO, probably ruined Josh McCown(who, btw, outplayed Warner). He just has a doghouse and if you get in it, you don't get out, logic and play be damned....

2006-10-18 01:55:07 · answer #3 · answered by Elminster 6 · 0 0

Denny Green is a good coach. hes a winning coach. he likes to make changes when things arent going well, he doesnt like to dwell on things and wait for things to happen. this is his 3 Offensive Coor. in 2 and half years. he thinks the best way to see results is to find someone that meshes well, and use the heck of that. Leinart played very very well. the thing is, it was PAINFUL to watch them run the ball, and all of their passes were either comeback routes or screen passes to the sides. they worked extremely well against the Bears D, we all saw that, Leinart went 2 TDs and no picks, to Grossmans 4 picks and 2 lost fumbles. i think there is more to it than just that one game where their offense was still productive. Offensive Coor. are also in charge of the offensive line, something the Cardinals DO NOT HAVE. Denny Green knows there is potential there, its been there, those guys just are not performing. the Bears DID NOT win that game, the Cardinals lost it.

GO CARDINALS!

2006-10-17 21:15:39 · answer #4 · answered by Duncan B 2 · 0 0

hmmm....you call the Bears coming back from a 20 point deficit (a record, by the way) without one offensive TD "luck"???? Are you mental??? And about Green: He was pissed off! He was disappointed! Put yourself in his shoes! I would have gone off too! His team had the game won, then let it slip away. Chicago's defense is a force to reckon with. Was it "dumb luck" that Urlacher stripped that ball? No, but it was "dumb luck" that the Cardinal's kicker missed that field goal!

2006-10-18 02:40:22 · answer #5 · answered by southerngirljw 4 · 0 0

i dont think its called luck when you beat a team without scoring an offensive touchdown. but denny green is a good coach. he almost got the vikings to super bowl had it not been for the kicker who missed his only kick of the season. but the cardinals are 1-5. he benched kurt warner and leinhart has played two pretty good games. but like someone pointed out their o-line is bad. if you are 1-5 and your offense is stagnant, who do you think gets fired? you certainly arent firing yourself.

2006-10-17 22:40:15 · answer #6 · answered by originalitybygeorge 5 · 1 0

Well you cant blame the coach for his team blowing that kind of lead. I feel he had the right to say what he said, since this is definitly not the first time this season.. And as for niel Rackers.. he shouldnt have had to be in that kind of position to make a game winning field goal. After the LEAD they had. Offence needs to learn to protect the football.

2006-10-18 01:16:40 · answer #7 · answered by marioistheshiz 2 · 1 0

I'm not a huge fan of either team, however, I feel that he overreacted just a little, at least to be on TV. I could understand he was frustrated because they were playing a hard, good game. However, for him to act like that in front of reports, cameras, and fans, was out of line. He should've saved that for the locker room and practice field.

2006-10-17 21:03:59 · answer #8 · answered by mizzgov_08 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers