is Washington DC one of them?
2006-10-17 19:56:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Other - United States
Washington DC has good public transportation. So does New York City, so does Chicago, so does Boston and the little cluster of cities around it (Cambridge/Somerville/etc.), so does San Francisco.
It's my opinion that Austin, Texas would probably be at least somewhat tolerable with public transportation plus a good bicycle.
Most other U.S. cities have terrible public transportation and are all spread out, impossible to navigate without a car.
2006-10-19 13:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by kbc10 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Washington DC is fine for those without a car. So is New York, Chicago, and San Francisco.
2006-10-19 02:47:43 · answer #2 · answered by SFdude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah you can get around DC proper without a car, but DC is kind of a cesspool (sorry to anyone from there) Look for a good transportation system and smallish geographic area. New York obviously is the first to come to mind. Don't move to LA without a car.
2006-10-18 02:58:38 · answer #3 · answered by Kathy C 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree
New york city is number 1 less then half of the residents would have a car.
DC has a good trans system also
boston would work
most east coast cities
2006-10-18 03:06:07 · answer #4 · answered by Slave to JC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen to Kathy.....you don't want to go to Washington, DC.
Most major cities in the US have good public transportation.
2006-10-18 03:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean a city you can get around in without a car? yes washington, New york, and Chicago, Los angeles is harder to do without a car.
2006-10-18 03:07:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chicago and San Francisco.
2006-10-18 03:00:30 · answer #7 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry but your question isn't clear. Are you looking for cities with good public transportation?
2006-10-18 02:58:58 · answer #8 · answered by princessmeltdown 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋