2006-10-17 18:14:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
THEY WERE NOT RULERS BUT DECAITS AND KILLERS. HOW THIS TYPE OF RULERS ARE BENEFITED FOR A COUNTRY,
2006-10-25 00:36:26 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Such questions really do not have any meaning or it is like asking is it good that tues day comes after monday.
Muslim rule came to India because the then Hindu rulers were utterly dis-united, in fact the whole hindu society has always been divided. It was never strong as a nation, so it fell easy prey to the invadors.
The muslim rulers were not for spreading hinduism, so they broke hundreds of Hindu temples, forcibly converted thousands of hindus and killed lacks of hindus who did not obey them. It is because of atrocity of muslims, sikkhism was born. They taxed hindus thru zazia. Their zakat was only for the benefit of muslims.
But who is to write or assess the true facts of what happened.
They did bring new type of literature, arts, crafts and culture as did the british. If chinese would have enslaved us, they would have brought theirs.
They did build Taj Mahal but also de-secreted thousands of temples. Some honest description of these can found in history books written by british scholars. One has to visit Kutub minar and read the inscriptions there.
2006-10-23 05:03:49 · answer #2 · answered by innocent 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In olden days, it is seldom that a ruler ruled the country with the welfare of the people in mind. They ruled the country as if it is their divine right to do so and the subjects duty it was to submit themselves to the dictates of the king, without any hesitation or protest. What good things that happened in their rule, was incidental and did due to the enterprise and perseverance of the people. The kings were enjoying the wealth of the nation, exploiting the people's labour and hardship. Some good souls who occupied the throne, did some good things. Some constructed dams, schools, temples and laid roads and planted trees. But, life was peaceful in general and people needed less material comforts, unlike to-day and therefore, they would not have expected much from the rulers. They would have been happy, if not oppressed by them.
2006-10-17 18:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here it comes again..
Despite all your misconceptions [ very debatable and argueable ]
the fact remains the same that muslim enriched India with thier architecture, literature, scientific innovations, love to the nation, poetry, music and what not...?
You name it and they did it.
Now few questions to Mr mitbrt..
Why Indian Govt was forced to attack Golden temple and almost destroyed it ??
If you know your history, the hindu kings used to TAX the people of defeated territory and the state also had to pay a lot of money etc. to the winner.
Even now every body has to pay taxes in one way or the other.
Muslims at that time also had to pay taxes like ZAKAT which hindus didnt have to pay. These taxes are /were paid for the upliftment of the country.
Why with all thier might and sword and whale of a time, the muslim rulers were not able to convert hindu majority to Islam ??
The fact is that no rule can last for so long without the cooperation of local people and TACIT TOLERATION.
Now something for pkdepp........There is only one writer who has been qouted. I invite you to read the following openions about Jesus given by non-muslim writers:
" We do not know of any book in the whole world less authenticated as to date, authers' names or tradition than our own christian Bible "--[ Isis Unveiled by Blavatsky, vol. II, p-277 ]
" Christianity of Peter exists no more, that of Paul supplanted it, and was in turn amalgamated with other worl religions "--[ ibid, vol II, p-275]
" We know very little about Jesus. The evangelists have daubed his life image so thickly with supernatural colours that the natural colours can not be restored. The Jesus of history is simply a problem and a problem can not be object of faith."--[ Dr. Straus quoted in Christ's Myth.]
" ..That the historic Jesus is something different from the Jesus Christ of the doctrine of the two natures, seems to us now selfevident. "--[ The Quest ]of the Historical Jesus by A. Schweitzer, translated by Montgomery F.C.Burki p3-4 ]
" Jesus Christ is product of the imagination of earl Chuch."--[ibid, pg-157]
" There was never any historical Jesus. " [ibid]
" Jesus our teacher has left no writings about himself."--[ The Writings of Origen b Frederick Crombie, Vol I, pg-445 ]
There were several Jesuses, see....
" Then stood up Jesus, son of Josedec. and his bretheren the priests and Zorobable, the son of Salathiel and his bretheren, made ready the altar of the God of Israel. "--[ I.Esdras,5:5 ]
" The wisdom of Jesus, the son of Sirach or Ecclesiasticus. The Jesus was the son of Sirach, the grandchild to Jesus of the same name with him."--[ Apocrypha, p-103 ]
" Jesus the son of Nave was valiant in wars, "--Ecclesiasticus,46:1 ]
" Jesus for fulfilling the word was made a judge in Israel."--[ Maccabees, 2:25 ]
" At that time they had a notorious prisoner called Jesus Barabbas; so, when they had gathered. Pilate said to them, who do you want released Jesus Barabbas or Jesus the so called Christ."--[ Matt, 27:16-17 ]
" They found a certain sorceror, a false prophet, a Jew whose name was Bar-Jesus."--[ Acts 13:16 ]
It can also be observed that one of the writers of The New Testament, one of the premier saints of Christianity, represents Jesus an illegitimate son of a ghost whom the saint considers , "holy", but whom some others think an " unholy demon " as he evidently brings about vices like " folly, adultry, frivolity, lewdness,......"--[ The Asatir by M.Gaster, p-132 ]
In Jewish scriptures jesus [pbuh] has been described as ..
" A bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord.." --[ Deut, 23:2 ].
The Quran on the other hand confirms that Jesus was a prophet sent by Allah.
2006-10-18 05:30:16 · answer #4 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muslims always favoured that person who was strong militarily,they had ignored all other qualities.
They tried to destroy hinduism from india by torture.
They had ignored economy .In need of money they used to plunder from riches and poor.
They proposed extra tax for hindus.
Most of them are illiterate and illcultured,so they didnt care for these.
Their military had no discipline,in this way they had destroyed india"s military might.
That is why thier ruling period was described as DARK AGE in indian history.
2006-10-19 18:09:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well it was a lot more beneficial no matter what the yanks think thats why india has more religions and a rich history than america india is also called the land of festivals because of its citizns belonging to all the different religions of the world look at christianity its a minority religion but still indian no matter what their religion celebrate christmas, diwali .eid and all other festivals
2006-10-17 20:59:45 · answer #6 · answered by YR1947 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100% beneficial for sure ! Tour India and you will find all over the country what those wonderful people did for us ! Taj Mahal is one such example for the whole goddamn world to come and see for themselves. I can give a hundred other examples, but I hope you get the point.
2006-10-17 19:56:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
As per my knowledge,every rule has its own advantages and disadvantages, but till our muslim rulers allowed british into our country we are all one. It means we have benefited more compared to the rule after them.
2006-10-24 21:24:27 · answer #8 · answered by sriram_rahi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THEY First called India Hindustan and try to unite and make hindustan a strong kingdom mixing afghanistan pakistan etc
2006-10-20 16:26:48 · answer #9 · answered by Job 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lot of cross cultural benefits. You can visit varanasi, the holy land of Hinduism and can see the difference.
2006-10-17 20:16:26 · answer #10 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only beneficiery thing is that they built beautiful monuments which now earns lot of money to our country.
2006-10-17 21:39:45 · answer #11 · answered by DeadPool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋