English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-17 18:12:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Our history was wrongly written.Siraj became king at very early age by that time he was completely spoiled due to pampering of his grandfather Alibardi.
Whenever siraj saw a beautiful woman,he forcefully brought her into his harem and captivated her lifelong[thousands in no.].
Siraj"s men attack ferry boats across ganges and drown the passengers.From the roof of the palace ,he used to enjoy the scene.
His torture on hindus was beyond toleration.
Nobody could make wealth from his fear .
He used to insult respected persons recklessly.He slapped Juggatseth[famous banker and businessman] in his durbar in front of all.
He killed Kuli Khan ,a relative of Ghasseti begum .
No person including both hindus and muslims could live a peaceful life in his regime.
Even the Darbesh who helped Mirjafar to captivate siraj was a victim of siraj's torture.Siraj cut his nose and ear previously.
So all the eminent personalities stood against his.He was described as a good person nowhere in history

2006-10-18 18:40:12 · update #1

6 answers

The battle was between Siraj Ud Daulah, the last independent Nawab of Bengal, and the forces of the British East India Company. Siraj-ud-Daulah's army commander had defected to the British, causing his army to collapse. After this defeat, the entire province of Bengal passed to the Company, and this battle is today seen as one of the pivotal battles leading to British Empire in India.

2006-10-17 18:25:01 · answer #1 · answered by Mukunda S 2 · 0 0

It led to the change of guard. It paved the way for the East India Company to take over the rule from the Indian rulers. The era of the British Rule in India, is a mixed bag. One important outcome of the British rule is that it really ruined our traditional means of production. The colonisation made this country in to a dumping ground for the cheap goods, manufactured by the English barons in England. The self supporting economy of the Indian country side suffered a severe set back from which it has not yet been able to revive itself.

2006-10-18 02:02:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It was the battle of liberation for the commonplace indian people who wanted to live in peace.
Robert Clive was a great hero.
He saved the life of many eminent personalities from the hand of Siraj and Miron[son of mirjafar]eg.Durlavram,sitaram roy,ramnarayan etc.
Englishmen had set up a descnt ruling system in Calcutta.
They never interfered in religious rituals of countrymen.
Whenever they took something from somebody they used to pay for it[unlike muslims,who loot everything they saw].
Englishmen didnt played with the izzat of our ladies unlike muslim rulers.
They spreaded culture , education and reforms in our life.That 1757 was a great year for us.It was semi-independence.

2006-10-19 10:37:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You moron stupid idiot ! You call our freedom fighter a tyrant, what will you call the British East India Co.? Your saviours?
You call yourself Swadesh (Patriotic) but you are nothing like that, you are the opposite of that, a traitor.

2006-10-18 03:02:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes u are right but What is your opinion about Sultan Tipu Shaheed?

2006-10-24 17:29:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bull dung ! No such battle.

Why do you bother people ... attention, OK you got mine and I wish you well.

With Sympathy,
Jonnie

2006-10-18 01:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by Jonnie 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers