Here's a former liberal welfare case drug addict who advocated putting ronny raygun on Mt. Rushmore despite the fact that he NEVER voted for him and voted against him once! What more hypocracy is there in public media?!?
2006-10-17 17:49:25 · 14 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, he is the worst there is. He got out of Vietnam by claiming he had an anal cyst, rotflmao.
2006-10-17 17:53:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You call THAT hypocracy??? What about the fact that the liberals are giving Mark Foley such a hard time about some text messages that aren't even sexual in nature, when Gerry Studs recieved a unanimous vote to be censured, then rejoined the house shortly after? "I did not break any U.S. laws", he said. That page was 18. The pages that Foley had "sexual liasons" with were 18 and 21. Even if the pages were under consensual age, what he did was not illegal.
This is a political tactic that's been around for a hundred years. You wait until just the right moment, then release some horrible fact (or at least make it look horrible) about an opponent, then while the public is still boiling over it, you give them one even worse. It's been done by both sides, and, can't you see it's right before election time? Quit sticking so hard with the politics. They all suck.
Please do not mistake me for someone who condones what Foley did, as I do not. I am definitely against what he did. But the double standard in the Liberal media is ridiculous. But you won't hear me... what's funny is that I'm not even claiming attachment to either conservative or liberal political affiliation. But you won't stop for a second and open your eyes, will you? If you do, I admire you for admitting that you might have been blinded.
2006-10-17 17:59:37 · answer #2 · answered by Rockstar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the key in all of your blather was--- He WAS on welfare. Not still on welfare. That's a key difference between the Rep view and the Dem view. Are you not happy that a former welfare recipient(if that's true) went out and got a job, supported himself and excelled in his field ? Are you not happy for someone who was addicted to prescription drugs and cleaned-up? HMMM What does make you happy? EDIT* WOW did you see Melanie's answer. Bought out by the neo-cons and has a pact with the devil? Holy sh-t. Does ANYBODY not understand why us Reps look at Lib Dems with a big question mark over our heads. You guys/gals are absolutely crazy sometimes. Holy sh-t
2016-05-21 22:40:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives say they have moved away from Rush so he is doing more covert activities, such as pushing ABC to do the phony "docudrama" called Path to 9/11. He and his cronies are trying to influence Hollywood and Television to move far to the right.
2006-10-17 17:53:13 · answer #4 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You my friend by the way you post your question aren't even worthy to carry Rush's jock strap. lmao If you libs are so right and so much smarter how come Air (smear) American had to file for bankruptcy? He runs circles around all of them with half his brain tied behind his back, the harmless little fuzzball!
2006-10-17 17:57:47 · answer #5 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's a man of the peple. Except for the taking Viagra to the boy's camp thing.
2006-10-17 17:50:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rush Limbaugh = Raunchy Limberger
mmm...might be good w/mustard on rye...got any Mentos handy?
2006-10-17 18:06:26 · answer #7 · answered by Farnham the Freeholder 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I guess for the same reason liberals clung to Bill Clinton in spite of his white house escapades....
2006-10-17 18:02:47 · answer #8 · answered by easinclair 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Too bad he's not a liberal. He has all the qualities you would embrace if he were.
Rush #1!!!! Mega Dittos!!!
2006-10-17 17:51:58 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? Because Raunch appeals so much to 'Ditto-heads'.
2006-10-17 17:52:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋