Not on my life!
2006-10-17 18:11:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aussie Chick 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm sorry, but no. I have felt the impact of having him in office personally. Not only are the gas prices outrageous but at this moment my kids do not have medical coverage because I cannot afford the continuing rising cost of medical insurance. Hilary Clinton made it her goal to try to get every child in the US covered with medical insurance. Once the new administration got in I feel that all her work went down the drain. I cannot answer for every single aspect of what George Bush has or has not done well for this country, I can only talk about what I know and how it has effected me. I do pay higher gas prices. My grocery bill has gone up (due to higher gas prices causing higher shipping on product). I have seen my taxes go up. And, as stated before, my medical has gotten so high I can no longer afford to cover my children. Yet, wages have gone down. Not a good balance. And all since George Bush has been in office. So, sorry, I would not vote for him again.
2006-10-17 17:50:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by H K 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course I would. The same way I'd cut off my arm to get out of having to clip my fingernails. That corrupt meglomaniac is, with out question, the worst excuse for a president this country will ever see.
2006-10-17 22:06:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is delicious irony that the Republican-controlled 80th Congress led the effort to approve the 22nd Amendment.
We will never, ever have the opportuntity to vote for GWB again. He will be history.
2006-10-17 17:53:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tom-SJ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Good question! Well, I did not vote for Dubya the last two times - I wanted Colin Powell - so I am certainly not going to again.
2006-10-17 17:49:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by midnightlydy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, he has not taken action against the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION, nor has he ordered deportation for all illegal aliens and their children....
I commend him for fighting the FILTHY Muslim terrorists in their own lands, but not the manner in which the fight is being fought.... More troops are needed, no political correctness interferance, and it needs to be fought much more harshly.... no mercy for terrorists or the countries or people who support their filthy terrorist actions in any manner... if the filthy Muslim Terrorists strike in the USA again, I condone the use of nuclear weapons against their homelands.... it is time to quit worrying about political correctness... and get the job finished.
2006-10-17 17:49:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Depends who he would run against. If he was running against an owl id have to go with bush considering the fact that humans have better judgement than owls. But hoot hoot would make a better address to the nation than any lie bush would have in store for us. Go to www.loosechange.com and watch what he did to us.
2006-10-17 17:44:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by newyorktocountry 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Just like before, it would depend entirely on who opposes him. I don't LIKE him, but I've been given no reasonable alternatives.
2006-10-17 17:45:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
If Canadians could vote in the US federal election...then no....no I definitely would not. But fear not my American friends...you can only go up from here!
2006-10-17 17:47:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mars 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, with hopes he would win so that all the people who said they would move out of the US if he won in 2004, would have a second chance at keeping their word.
2006-10-17 17:44:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Huevos Rancheros 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
What kind of lame *** question is that?! You wanna give us nightmares??? What are you on? If it's meant to be a joke, then I'll forgive you. Gosh, the thought makes my blood curdle!!!
2006-10-17 17:43:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by liberalthinktank 3
·
2⤊
3⤋