There is no fundamental difference among our ideas on different things becasuse we cannot analyse things by what we can never have.
2006-10-17 17:01:19 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
For proof see: http://wwf.edula.com
2006-10-17 17:08:57 · update #1
The suspect reasoning is in this line:
Nothing = what anything is not = what is anyone is not = what you are not
Nothing = what anything is not -- OK agreed.
Nothing = what is anyone is not -- OOPS We have a problem. A STONE is not "nothing" but it is definitely something that ANYONE is not.
Thus the equation does not work right there.
2006-10-17 17:13:23 · answer #1 · answered by hq3 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
enable's only back up slightly here. Is there a elementary distinction between our innovations on somewhat some issues? You guess. in any different case we does no longer have diverse political events, we does no longer have diverse religions, we does no longer have diverse something. As for naming issues, each and each united states and each and each lifestyle has its own call for issues. So i'm not sure what your factor is here. i assume we've a fundamenetal distinction in our innovations.
2016-12-08 16:34:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
err..
I don't need to know any particle physics to describe the beauty of a sculpture, but just because beauty merely supervenes on some physical structure, it doesn't follow that I can't form a theory of characterizing the aesthetic that fragments from whatever underlies the composition.
2006-10-17 17:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by -.- 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm assuming that this statement is saying that while we can pretend that we each have different viewpoints/opinions on any given topic, we (as a collective) cannot transcend ANY of the given viewpoints/opinions given and therefore, cannot truly have a 'fundamental' difference between them.
in short, this 'question' is merely a game of semantics....
2006-10-17 17:07:09 · answer #4 · answered by shatzy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is that a fancy way of saying that everyone will always do what they think is the right and best thing to do in their interests?
2006-10-17 17:04:17 · answer #5 · answered by boo! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a simple reason that your statement is true, which is that it's a truism. It's logically tautologous (necessarily true by virtue of its form).
2006-10-17 18:23:15 · answer #6 · answered by Drew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you and your web site are seriously confused. We can not miss what we do not have, but this does not speak to ideation. Your site is why Eastern philosophy bores me.
2006-10-17 17:17:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of our ideas are thoughts. the bottom line is everything comes from our little mind.
2006-10-17 19:22:24 · answer #8 · answered by ol's one 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we have everything.
so we are saying something as when and when observed by us in different contexts,
whatever arrived through them are known as research contents.
2006-10-17 17:50:00 · answer #9 · answered by prince47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋