is justly limiting fortunes taking from nonearners & giving to back to earners?

Question

clearly there are many wideopen legal thefts in the economy - as well as the illegal thefts - eg, buy land, others build city, landowners gets paid - eg, inflation an unjust tax - stockmarket reflects national infrastructure growth [created by every worker], & only stockholders get the gain
clearly the incomes & fortunes are not just, ie not proportional to work
clearly the incomes & fortunes are extremely far from just - 225 ppl with as much as 2,500,000,000 ppl -
1% getting 90% of world income, & doing less than 1% of work
clearly richgetricheretc is true & unjust
clearly moneymakesmoney is unjust
clearly transaction is inherently unjust [the two items have to have workvalue of x & x+y, ie have to be different - over trillions of transactions this will move earnings to nonearners steadily]
clearly 'after the first million money multiplies like rabbits' indicates injustice - ditto 'the first $1000 harder to make than the second million' ie, ratio work/pay changes greatly

Answer 1

Again, you completely forget nearly a third of production: Capital.

Without sophisticated machines, our workers are unable to produce as they do.

Without sophisticated educations (human capital), workers would be completely unable to do their jobs.

Is it just not to pay the man who owns the capital?

Is it just not to pay someone for their education and expreience they are bringing to the job?

If you want to limit weath and earnings, you're going to lose capital and education. Why study engineering, when an art student makes the same amount? Why create a more efficient business when your current business has brought your income to the legal limit?

If you really want to feed the starving in the world, the quickest way is to protect the wealthy (protect capital).
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You're first thousand is definitely easier than your second million, unless you live in an oppressed african country. Making a second million requires years of waiting, leadership or stupid luck. You can make $1000 working normal hours for a few months (at most). Remember that if you put your first million at risk in order to make the second, you could potentially lose everything.

Answer 2

Is it just to get points by not asking a question? Or should they be reporting for non-earning? Let's find out.

Answer 3

you`re talking about taxes