English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

meet?
everyone seems to have a strong Republican, Democratic or Liberal view to their questions., and all of you seem to be involved in your countries politics (or are using this site to pretend you do), yet less than 50% of the population votes, infact only 39% voted at the last Presidential election, does this mean everyone on Yahoo (politics section) is a voter? Or are you a hypocrit that did nothing at the last election and now come to Yahoo answers to voice your opinions rather than use your democratic right to vote for your opinion?

2006-10-17 15:52:53 · 7 answers · asked by Aussieblonde -bundy'd 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

thanks mini, i'll remember that should i ever grow a penis and begin thinking about having the foreskin removed.

2006-10-17 16:02:17 · update #1

7 answers

I got caught smoking pot when I was 18 years old which was 30 years ago and a bag of pot. At the time anything over 1 oz of pot was a felony so possession with intent to delver was the charges. I got a large fine and 5 years suspended. It is no longer a felony crime but still I got caught before the law was changed.

I have not done any drugs in a good 27 to 28 years so what ever that is worth to you.

But,

With a felony on my record I can not ever vote, hold office or own a gun of any kind. But I can try to help others see the right or wrong path they are on.

And the dumbest thing that a person can do is to vote for a party only. Both parties are hard headed and are on a path to make the party rich and powerful and nothing more. People use them just to get in office. So it is more like the Bank of the Republicans and then there is the other Bank of the Democrats. You have to join up with one or the other which ever will have you and they will help you get in office. Now what you do after you get there is up to you.

People in the USA needs to learn to vote for the person not the Party.. Very very importune to pick a person who has good credits through life and beleives like you want your leaders to believe. If you vote Republican only the country will be at war in a flash. Republicans are known for war. If you vote Democrat you know that are known to think more about what is going on inside the country. But there are good and bad in each party. Bush was a bad one but the Republican party had the strongest pull and got him in office.

Right now we need to get out of war so everyone will vote for democrat. Unless we end up in a war with NK then the Republicans might stand a chance. Which is still wrong way to vote. Put people in office not a part.. It really needs to be stressed heavy .. Put people in office not party..

Did you know that if you are caught smoking pot now it is only like a 50 dollar fine. .What a change in the laws..

2006-10-17 16:15:43 · answer #1 · answered by Don K 5 · 1 0

each and every time am on yahoo solutions(politics) am continually seeing DEMOCRATS taking issues out of hand, really about McCain.....i think of their is a line we'd want to continually not in any respect flow yet they flow all of it the time and on each and every topic!!..... do they believe that declaring racist issues about McCain is going to modify republican perspectives of him or is it in basic terms part of their nature to be hateful(am no longer declaring that all democrats are hateful, in basic terms maximum on yahoo solutions)??....i imagine they ought to come back up with a sparkling tactic, election day is around the nook lol.... See? It is going both concepts... you in difficulty-free words ever locate what you're searching for therefore try searching some democrat questions and also you may see... end jumping the gun...

2016-12-04 22:53:03 · answer #2 · answered by marquard 4 · 0 0

I voted in the last election by not voting because I thought both candidates were not qualified to be the President of the United States.

2006-10-17 16:01:39 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Main Event 5 · 1 1

I completely agree with you on all your answers to other questions Aussieblone. I am also from Australia. Isn't it just so much better over here? People are so damned uptight in America. Seeya mate.

2006-10-17 17:49:17 · answer #4 · answered by Sheriff Leane 1 · 0 0

I am from the land of Australia, where hot women and buff men meet and sex on the tropicana beaches

2006-10-17 16:00:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I proudly vote Republican and argue my convictions (No pun intended) !!

2006-10-17 15:58:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm....
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/............

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/ph...
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.htm...
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/.........
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/ph...
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcirc...
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydie...

I LOVE FORESKIN

2006-10-17 16:00:12 · answer #7 · answered by miniboi6666 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers