English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
17

if marxist communism is such a wonderful thing and capitalism is so awful, then why did communist govt's have to keep their citizens behind a wall with machine guns and barbed wire? why are cubans risking their lives in shark infested ocean to defect to the evil capitalist america? why would there be defectors in the first place if communism is so great? plus, how many people are trying to defect to a communist nation? how many americans are risking their lives to escape to cuba or any other utopian "worker's paradise"?? did it occur to you that these people knew a little more about communism than you?

2006-10-17 14:50:07 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

You are right on. The fact of the matter is, Liberals want whatever is the opposite of what is currently going on.

We are in Iraq, they want us in North Korea.
We want a wall on the border, They want a flood of illegals and terrorists.
You want Ice Cream, They want a fire to melt it.

Same old thing with liberals, no brain, no voice, no soul.

2006-10-17 14:55:47 · answer #1 · answered by buffman316 2 · 1 7

there are over 30 million American citizens currently living behind walls topped with machine guns and barbed wire in the prison system, and who knows how many more living in fear and in gated communities. And there are almost 50 million Americans living outside of the USA because they are disgusted at what is being done there. And since you refer to the "communist governments" of Cuba and I assume the Soviet empire as "marxist communists" then I assume that even that illiterate retarded abortion George W Bush knows more about communism than you do. You should try reading one day. I recommend that you try reading Marx. He was indispensible to the development of captalism and you have (among others) him to thank for the development of the market system that you enjoy today.
And what makes you think that liberals have anything to do with communism? I am not a liberal, and I can tell you that the classic liberal ideology has about as much to do with communism in any form as conservatism does. Even less, in all honesty. Communists and Nazis were the pioneers of the oppressive style military regimes that are favored by conservatives. Liberals believe in opening up the markets and allowing trade to solve the problems of the world regardless of others ideology.
Did you even go to highschool?

2006-10-17 15:05:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

First and foremost, you sound like you are totally out of the times. But once blindfolded always blindfolded! Also, who was the ignorant who told you (Or is it you?) that liberals are Communists? And can you tell me what is the difference between these two philosophies? I bet you cant!

Now here this:
THE EFFECT OF IMPERIALISM!
Since Emperor “Bush” and Viceroy “Dick” took over the reins of the country, the American jungle of capitalism has far exceeded the ills of Communism. Thus, as I see it, the fall of the once great American democracy is just round the corner. For that, we only have to thank the so called Conservative Republicans. Or should I say Passionate Republicans?

2006-10-17 15:01:14 · answer #3 · answered by Nikolas S 6 · 2 0

Why are you asking Liberals to justify Communism? Libertarianism is a system of individual freedom and is the opposite of Communism, which is an oppressive system that denies individual freedom.

As you rightly say, Communist states are intrusive, authoritarian, secretive and a real danger.

I think America defines a Liberal differently than we do in Europe.

2006-10-17 15:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by Cracker 4 · 1 0

every country in the world that has ever claimed to be Communist has never practiced the Marxist Communism. Marxism states that all people should work together to improve the common good, but people are selfish by nature. this is why Communism in its originally intended form is a failure.

2006-10-17 14:58:39 · answer #5 · answered by michelle 3 · 1 0

properly, the arguement for abortion is that the fetus isn't a human because of the fact significant existence hasn't yet started... do no longer question me to describe the best judgment, because of the fact i do no longer are conscious of it myself. it is all basically splitting hairs to circumvent accountability to me. there is basically too many questions with that like how do you define significant existence and whilst does it start up? in no way have been given an answer to which you already know. So I basically as lots anticipate they actually do no longer comprehend, they do exactly no longer % it to be incorrect, so therefor of their minds it is not any longer. Too undesirable existence would not quite artwork that way. Which in mild of your question, are they announcing killing human beings is a significant existence? ok. I admit. it is a doubtful argument at ultimate. For me, the dying penalty is approximately paying decrease back what you took. you could in no way supply a existence decrease back, yet you grants your guy or woman.

2016-10-19 22:01:25 · answer #6 · answered by lindgren 4 · 0 0

Communism is not a good system because people have no rights.

2006-10-17 14:52:48 · answer #7 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 0

those nations are about as Communist as Saddam and his one man ballots were democratic...

your question is like me asking conservatives why they invaded the democracy of Iraq... the main difference between me and you is that I know what a dictatorship is and what communism and democracy are...

2006-10-17 15:13:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Quit it now, you are a commie. We see through that rubbage. Quit campaigning for 2008 election. Just because you can easily see repubs don't have a chance don't mean you commies have one.

2006-10-17 15:12:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Liberal speaking.....your "argument" is so full of holes and all over the place.

When you understand the difference between being a liberal and a communist then we can talk.

2006-10-17 14:57:16 · answer #10 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 4 0

Dude, you're 40 or so years late. Put your 1969 copy of Time magazine down and talk to your neighborhood liberal. These days, we are much more about fighting to save your personal freedoms while you cheer for your government as they take them away from you. Thanks for noticing.

2006-10-17 14:59:31 · answer #11 · answered by Mark M 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers