English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ill try to keep it simple..
Am no American.. but from what iv seen and heard and read( i can figure out that).. Mr bush isn't that much ov a thinker ,the man cant evn think for himself..he cant think on his feet.. not much ov a speaker also,, he says things like its a script or something..basically hes no politician.. hav u evr seen a democratic country elects the son ov a former president.. what are the odds in that hm-mm..

basically why don't people blame the people behind the scene that sture things up.. and write his scripts..??

p.s...if u know more about this subject..please tell me more ^_^

2006-10-17 14:08:03 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

I completely agree.
* when you watch Bush's speaking appointments you'll notice that when he deviates from the original scripted speech in front of him, he gets himself into REAL trouble. The Umm's and the failed attempts at using common euphemisms and anecdotes (which would be quite comical if they weren't coming from the leader of the free world), bring to mind painful, embarrassing moments we've all experienced in the past--only his are daily occurences, it seems. Unfortunately, those that are huge Bush supporter's rarely take the time to watch his speeches, let alone try to decipher his true meaning behind all the shaky starts and stops and his horrible use of the English language. Luckily, there is only 2 years left before the American public will show the world that we have had enough, and elect someone worthy of the office.

2006-10-17 14:11:09 · answer #1 · answered by Katie 4 · 2 1

Harry Truman was a real president and he accepted everything that was bad was his fault. He had a sign on his desk that said "the buck stops here" Mr. Bush is good at either blaming others or lying his way out of things. But you are right it is the people in the background that is making these horrible decisions but he has to live up to them or let everyone know that he isn't really running the country.

2006-10-17 14:17:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I am a US citizen and did not vote for this man. I have believed since the day he was supposedly elected. People seem to forget that there were issues with the votes when he ran the first time. He is corrupt, he does not have the heart of the US in his mind. He has his own agenda. I am embarrassed to have him as my president and I have no respect for this man. He has made very bad decisions and my welfare as well as my families and the future of my children are at stake. He went against the UN with Iraq war and now blames Korea for doing the same things! He thinks of himself and that's all. I do not trust his intentions.

2006-10-17 14:21:39 · answer #3 · answered by 10 pts for me? 4 · 0 0

When you are at the top of the mountain, everyone can see you. The blaming comes with the job.

The problem is no one wants to take responsibility for their problems. Instead, they prefer to blame some person with obvious signs of power. We have blamed corporations and Bill Gates for problems. People tried to blame Bill Clinton for some trouble. People blame Adolf Hitler for the Holocust in World War II. The victorious European countries of World War I forced the blame on the losers. People blame natural and reoccurring forces of nature for the loss of their belongings.

Does blaming help the situation? No, but it makes some people feel better.

Bush is not to blame. Bush is not the one running the U.S. government. The U.S. people are suppose to be running the U.S. What we really need are new rules for election campaigns.

2006-10-17 14:37:39 · answer #4 · answered by lightning_bug_x 2 · 0 0

The democratic party is in disarray as the extreme left wing liberals are making more and more demands upon the 'left of center' majority. The ONLY thing they can all rally around is a hatred for George Bush. Being the media is liberal, it helps all it can. And it's working, so it feeds upon itself and keeps growing.
And your opinion is like many in that he's not a thinker, and is why he is underestimated and wins elections. He thinks rather well.

2006-10-17 14:11:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

that may not my opinion, in simple terms what i know approximately historic past - and could be seen an extremely primary overview for the purpose of answering your question. The forcing of the state of Israel interior the middle East displaced the Palestinians and left them without united states (or in basic terms a million/2 - and not the area they needed). After lots of the Jewish human beings have been annihilated because of the Holocaust in the time of WWII, the international felt undesirable and easily desperate the Jewish human beings could desire to have their own united states - and the Jewish human beings needed it to be the place they think approximately is their "Promised Land", that's Jerusalem, located in Palestine. subsequently, this action left the Palestinians nationless. So, the Palestinians are, and characteristic been, a collection of annoyed human beings for the reason that then... which has brought about continual strife for the reason that then, against Israel and of direction, any "Western" united states that helped choose that destiny some time past... The Jewish community will say they have consistently been interior the area - that's genuine, many Jewish immigrants went their in diferent waves, even though it become never formally their territory till after WWII. a respectable source is the hyperlink i've got linked.

2016-11-23 16:46:34 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It is really papa Bush and his gang that are running the show. Dubbya is just the front man. Look up Skull and Bones, and The Bohemian Grove, and you will find more than you probably want to know. Also check out Preston Bush and Hitler if you can stomach it. That part is also in the Congressional Record if you care to look.

2006-10-17 14:19:57 · answer #7 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0 0

Nobody knows, People just say things and blame it on the person in charge..you know? The war is bad but if the war stops then we'll all get bombed or something like that. If the war keeps going that won't happen but the soldiers are getting killed. But in my oppinion the war should keep going on, it's not killing everybody. if the war stopped that would happen. So, Bush keeps the war. It's not his fault, just being a good president. He may not be the best but you know, nobody can!

2006-10-17 14:14:47 · answer #8 · answered by Phil 4 · 0 1

Bush does speak in scripts, but he also runs a major oil company in the US. Since money is power, he holds a majority of it now since he raised the gas prices and blamed it on war.

2006-10-17 14:14:44 · answer #9 · answered by heroinglitter 2 · 1 0

It's easier to blame President Bush than to take personal responsibility.

2006-10-17 14:10:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers