I agree with you about it being too late about so many troups dying. I NEVER agreed with war from the beginning and I do not see how Bush can save his face now. As far as pulling out...well, we can't just destroy a country and then say adios. We do have to fix what Bush f*ckd up. How? Don't know. It was never our business to begin with.
2006-10-17 14:11:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by 10 pts for me? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we do not complete the mission in Iraq and come home we may not see immediate implications of doing so but Iraq would quickly fall into Civil War, which is not necessarily a bad thing within itself.
However in time due to the carnage that this Civil War will bring to the region many more disciples of terror would grow out of the anger of us abandoning them and we would only have increased the strength of our enemy.
It is best to stay, but we must embolden our troops and the Iraqi military to seek out and kill any and all terrorists and supporters.
If freedom is ever to take hold there it will go along way towards making it nearly impossible to recruit terrorists ever again.
2006-10-17 14:32:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now. in the time of his little assembly he had with Hillary, she shared bill's secret. "tell them something to get elected. they gained't bear in mind a element 2 weeks after the election." Like Clinton, he's campaigning as a centrist. as quickly as elected, back like bill, he will flow decrease back to the left. it incredibly is the priority with human beings. They spend extra time listening to what a toddler-kisser says and not sufficient seeing what he does..or has achieved. Obama's a socialist and continuously would be. All this crap popping out of his mouth now's merely marketing campaign spew. And if the yank human beings have self assurance it, they'll get what they deserve.
2016-12-13 10:14:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I don't give a rats a s s if Iraq gets better or worse - I do, however, care deeply for the safety of my family and friends.
And a terrorist victory on the heels of their tactics of murder and maiming thousands of innocent people doesn't sound to me like a step in the right direction.
2006-10-17 14:13:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush says the terrorists will follow US troops if he allows them to come home
2006-10-17 14:14:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
655,000 dead Iraqi, 2800 dead Americans, many, many more wounded and deformed for life. How on earth could it be any worse. I think that they would have their civil war, decide what kind of government that they wanted and things would quiet down. We might not agree with their form of government but do they not have a right to form it, in their own country?
2006-10-17 14:09:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes b/c you would be leaving Iraq as an ungoverned state where terrorist would be allowed a stronghold.
2006-10-17 14:08:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well there is a difference between people that are trying to get peace verses thouse that want anything but peace, or at least some of us see it that way.
2006-10-17 14:54:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah really, but of course liberals love terrorist.
2006-10-17 14:13:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ah Ha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely....
2006-10-17 14:25:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋