Should the next president declare Bush an enemy combatant for helping terrrorists destroy the constitution?

Answer 1

If we have one, yes.

Answer 2

No. While I think that the next president will certainly have to show that America is going to go on a different course, I don't think that such a drastic measure will be necessary. It's not much different than the finger pointing that has gone on recently towards the Clinton administration. Many Republicans accuse the previous president on dropping the ball and ultimately allowing 9/11 to happen. But no one would seriously consider any sort of "official" charge against the previous pres or anyone working with him. In the long run, we are in a big mess that we made and have an obligation to clean up. We need to learn from the mistakes that were made in the hope of not repeating them. The time for finger pointing is over. It's time to simply admit we were wrong and figure out where to go from here.

Answer 3

What!?! that's an outrage. This if truth be told supplies the government the liberty to do regardless of they %, to whoever they %, with out any degree of accountability in anyway. whilst will the persons of u.s. found out that their very freedom, the subject they touted approximately maximum, are under attack by using the government and idiotic baboon they voted into place? they think of 350+ years of democracy meant that their rights and freedoms are unassailable, whilst will they study that their complacency is allowing the government to pervade into and administration further and extra of their lives, straight away opposite to the spirit of the form? actual now the U. S. has already imprison and torture hundred, if no longer hundreds of harmless human beings from the middle east, under the least pretext, quickly they’ll start up on their own electorate. All of it quite is disregarded by using the electorate persons because of the fact they think of that it gained’t ensue to them. whilst will they comprehend that they are the subsequent centred demographic? Thank god i'm a Canadian. (Assasination is sounding like a extra effective and extra effective thought.)

Answer 4

The next president should just shut up for couple of months before saying anything about Bush or his somehow well-known military tactics ! He or she will have to focus on the " people " and their needs as U.S citizens , take care of what's " Home of the brave " not what's going on in other people's countries.

Answer 5

Once again an absurd question, Bush will be looked favorably upon in the history books, second only to Reagan.

http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=irishdictator

Answer 6

Bush is not destroying the Constitution. Maybe you care more about the perceived rights of the terrorists than the American lives that are being saved by the harsh measures necessary to extract information from the bad guys and thwart future attacks on OUR SOIL. PLEASE GIVE ME A BREAK WITH THIS LIBERAL WHINING. Do you think we should fight TERRORISM with paper, scissors, or ROCK?

Answer 7

I just think that the next administration should have an asterisk placed next to Bushes name in the anals of presidents denoting the total ineffectiveness of his tenure.

Answer 8

Yes, but this country isnt going down the toilet yet. We still have world leaders under our belt. It won't be long though before the neocons cause America to crash due to greed.

Answer 9

if its a liberal they will regardless of what the country wants, ill gladly give up a drink on the airplane if it means preventing another 9/11

Answer 10

the only people destroying the constitution are the democrats.

Answer 11

Nope.