Not only that, but they bring them into their otherwise white homes! How immoral is that?!? Shouldn't it be illegal?
2006-10-17 12:45:13 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It's more disgusting that you as a person living in a privileged western country not only isn't doing anything about war torn children in poor countries like perhaps sponsoring a child so they can eat, have a roof over their head, have proper clothing, can go to school, etc.
Instead of dissing others for trying to help, maybe you should shut your trap, get off your butt & put your misdirected words into positive action!
By the way... your inconsiderate verbal use of words to discredit Ms. Jolie as branding her "Braneglina" shows how much you really care about doing the right & moral thing, legal/illegal/or just plain respectful?!!!
2006-10-19 12:24:15 · answer #1 · answered by Doug 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about?! You're saying that people with millions of dollars should not spend their money on charity, to help children in a third world country. Oh yes, how disgusting. And adopting kids with no parents. How terrible! What do you want? Maybe they are paid too much, but I'd rather see that money go to helping people who need it than on fancy cars and massive homes. And if they have enough for both, great.
2006-10-17 12:49:33 · answer #2 · answered by twasbrillig 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
U sound a little prejudice to me. On one hand I think it's commendable while on the other hand I think that instead of taking just one child and giving it the best they can why not invest the money they'll spend on the child to help the entire community where that child should grow up learning their on culture and customs. To take any animal human or not out of their environment is really disgusting and cruel, in my opinion.
2006-10-17 13:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by papabeartex 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Part of the gripe is that she was allowed immediate adoption based on "money" and not on being a good parent.
Potential parents are always screened.
I guess Madonna is exempt from everything. Since she can do sex dances on poles, do provactive 3somes in her videos, then turn around and write baby books.....hmm.
2006-10-17 13:00:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it isn't disqusting that celebrities help children of any race......I wish that there weren't any children that were in foster care, I wish they all had wonderful happy love filled homes. Anyone against a child of any race or color having a better life.....that is what should be illegal.........YOU!
2006-10-17 12:55:12 · answer #5 · answered by dananapril 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How there going about it is wrong. They're taking a select few and giving them a lavish lifestyle while the others remain deprived. They should just donate money and have their own children, naturally.
2006-10-17 12:51:28 · answer #6 · answered by spackler 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a shame and if they truly wanted them to be taken care of they would donate their money to the countries in need instead of mixing the children up. They take them away from their heritage and expect them to be just like them and it is sad.
2006-10-18 02:25:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, that is not disgusting and it is moral. That is a very racist thing to say. Not saying that you are but what you said was. That is just saying they like to help people in need.
2006-10-17 12:57:44 · answer #8 · answered by redbone 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WOW youracist B**** They are doing a GOOD Service for other people who are WAY LESS FORUNATE THAN U SO SHUT THE FRONT DOOR
i'll tell you what should be illegal RACISM
2006-10-17 15:46:14 · answer #9 · answered by novaicedogs9 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all, because they are helping a child who would have otherwise died. and as far as their "white" homes, you've got some nerve.
2006-10-17 13:28:42 · answer #10 · answered by trisha_r_c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋