Winning a debate?

Question

For my history class I'm doing this debate about the Boston Massacre.. but I really have to win because I happen to be debating against one of my friends who I have to beat- it's a really long story

I need help: how do I win a debate about the pro-patriot side of the Boston Massacre?

I not only need information, but primarily help with debating skills.

Answer 1

First, know as much about the Boston Massacre as you can. Know all the *facts*. Do not worry about opinions at this point.

Fact: 5 Americans were killed by British soldiers

Your opinion: They shouldn't have been (Pro Patriot)

Your opponents opinion--You don't know what it will be yet. So you need *anticipate* the angles he/she will take in the argument and be able to counter them.

Fact: There were other tensions leading up to this act, and it all eventually headed toward the American Revolution.

This is background you can use--but try not to stray from your original subject too much.

Debating:

First, start of visually with a shoebox. Hold it up. Take the lid off and show everyone inside. (You've cut the bottom out but don't let anyone see that until the time you hold it up). Announce loudly, "Ladies and gentlemen, my opponent's arguments are as empty as this box."

And then proceed to pick apart their arguments one by one.

This doesn't always mean just saying "They're wrong". On the contrary, you should *agree* with some of their points and then show why they are wrong.

For instance, "I agree with my opponent when he says that the patriots shouldn't have used clubs that evening."

Relate your winning points to today's events that are controversial and people can relate to...sway them to your side.

Continuing from the sentence above:

"...shouldn't have used clubs that evening. But just like Los Angeles police beating Rodney King, the British Soldiers used excessive force resulting in five needless deaths. Surely my opponent is not saying these were appropriate actions?"

Never, ever say something to the effect of:

"I think" / "It's my opinion" etc. We know it is your opinion because you are giving your side of the debate. Come off much more strongly by stating your opinion *as if it were fact*.

For instance:

"I think the British soldiers were wrong" (Weak)

"Clearly, British soldiers in Boston harassed the public" (Strong)

And makes your opinion seem factual.

Transitions like "Clearly" / "Undoubtedly" / "Certainly" etc imply that you are already right and there is no room for any other argument.

Good luck and win!

Regards,

Mysstere