2006-10-17 11:33:15 · 10 answers · asked by suzipurpleroses 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Probably....but's it's still funny
2006-10-17 11:43:06 · answer #1 · answered by suuperman420 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably.
The New York State Departments of Environmental Conservation and Health has stict regulations regarding the disposal of animal remains ... and I'm pretty sure tying them to the back of a strangers car is not in the book.
Also, it could lead to the assumption that the animal was alive when it was tied to the car and lead to great distress on the part of the car owner. I know if that if it happened to me, I would find something to get you charged with.
2006-10-17 13:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by BoomChikkaBoom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I separate the track from the guy making it, to a huge degree. there are various rock stars who're jerks, that's component to rock and roll. i think of the n-be conscious is reprehensible, and it exhibits some thing deep with regard to the character of the person. in spite of the indisputable fact that, i would not blacklist an artist from my playlist for having been common to utter it as quickly as. surprisingly considering Costello is British, the place the be conscious isn't interior sight. there have been racist musicians, and homophobic ones, and ignorant ones. oftentimes the worst offenders additionally are no longer useful musicians, so no predicament comes up. yet "total Lotta Shakin' Goin On'" is my famous track between men who married 13-one year-outdated cousins, and there are various different super songs via people who're reprehensible characters in genuine existence. I have no problem with listening to Phil Spector archives, or maybe Charles Manson's albums. they're good or thrilling track. i think of the two belong in reformatory. yet those are the boys, no longer the track. i'm no longer gonna carry posters of them on my wall, or deliver them autograph requests or something. yet "Be My toddler" belongs to me and all and sundry else who loves it, to no longer Phil Spector. track is track. I physique of concepts it on those words.
2016-12-16 09:22:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not quite sure. I only found one state statute that may apply. Petty vandalism and the sort is usually handled by city statutes. You might want to check those and search for "vandalism" or "vandalism of an automobile" in your local code.
It may be "Criminal Mischief in the Fourth Degree" which says "[a] person is guilty of criminal mischief in the fourth degree when, having no right to do so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he has such right, he:
(1) Intentionally damages property of another person
NY CLS Penal section 145.00(1)
2006-10-17 11:54:51 · answer #4 · answered by Charles15589 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Messing with anyone else's stuff is a crime in itself. Nevermind that there's a raccoon attached to the rope.
2006-10-17 11:40:58 · answer #5 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't now New York's laws but I would assume yes, but I don't know
2006-10-17 11:46:02 · answer #6 · answered by Dena T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably vandalism and disturbing the peace.
2006-10-17 11:42:39 · answer #7 · answered by my brain hurts 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a prank but not a crime
2006-10-17 11:42:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not really it could jst be a prank
2006-10-17 11:40:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
is that animal abuse?
2006-10-17 11:41:16 · answer #10 · answered by love154100 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋