English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I say yes.

We now have virtual reality news, where the MSM has created an artificial world in which only Republicans have scandals.

2006-10-17 11:01:29 · 12 answers · asked by Jean R 3 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Harry Reid's scandal will not receive the amount of coverage that Foley's did because the main stream media have a political agenda of their own. If more does come out about Reid (I think they have just scratched the surface) it will be kept quiet until after the Nov elections.

2006-10-17 11:18:50 · answer #1 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2 0

In reviewing the New York Times, it seems that the "Newspaper of Record" is very interested in reporting Reid's issues as well as Foley's. (There is just something more sinister about the Foley affair though).

2006-10-17 18:41:47 · answer #2 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 1 0

Ummmm,

Foley, a closet gay republican tried to lure children into bed with him.

Reid didn't tell congress that he sold some land like he was supposed to.

Do you REALLY think that is the same level of scandal?"

2006-10-17 18:33:15 · answer #3 · answered by grdnoviz 4 · 0 1

Mark Foley's scandal is all about SLEAZE, so it gets more attention. Reid's scandal doesn't involve sex so it isn't a big draw.

2006-10-17 18:13:32 · answer #4 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 1 0

well... first off... one is a sex scandal... they ALWAYS GET MORE PLAY... I don't remember you complaining during Clinton... and it's WITH KIDS... which is also media dynamite

second... I've yet to see one person that can cite the laws being broken by reid...apparently the only thing he has broken are congress ethics rules... which is usually a pretty minor thing...

you're comparing apples to oranges...

2006-10-17 18:06:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Child sex predator in charge of making laws protecting minors vs. incomplete paperwork on a land deal, hmm. let's see. I think the correct answer is "The only way the child sex thing would NOT be covered more is in A Republican's Wildest Dream".

2006-10-17 18:04:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You saying it doesn't make it true. Reid did nothing illegal and at worst he is guilty of a technical ethics violation. Even that has not been determined yet. Sorry but there's no there, there.

2006-10-17 18:04:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

they should be. queers and monkey butt phukkers have brought aids into the world killing innocent ryan white and others.

thieves can more easily make amends by repaying what they stole, but you can never bring innocent victims of aids lives back.

2006-10-17 18:06:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

99.9% of republicans are crooks cheats and liars the others just aint got caught yet

2006-10-17 18:05:14 · answer #9 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 0 1

isn't Reid's scandal relatively new?

2006-10-17 18:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers